On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:45 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:47 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > I think (opinion) that the most easy way to get things in a clean way
> > into an upstream version, is to split Camel away from EDS. I noticed
> > that Jeffrey wouldn't object
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:04 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > > it is indeed a synchronous API :)
> > > Syncronous, but it fails the "you know if you've succeeded when the
> > > function returns" test.
> >
> > most of the camel APIs don't fail that test
> >
> This was in the context of something I
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:39 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > So it sounds as if Camel could (in principle) respond to a move
> request
> > > > by issuing the appropriate IMAP command and then, starting a
> thread to
> > > > do the other activities (indexing the target folder and deleting
> th
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:27 -0300, Sebastien Tandel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>I am looking at the way CAMEL is working and have some questions
> about the cache implementation.
>
> First, let's see if I've understood the mechanism basics (and, of
> course, don't hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong :
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:46 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I'm preserving the exchange for context; my responses are sprinkled
> below.
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 23:47 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 15:55 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffre
Hi,
I am looking at the way CAMEL is working and have some questions
about the cache implementation.
First, let's see if I've understood the mechanism basics (and, of
course, don't hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong :))
Camel has a "generic" cache system which stores objects in Camel Bags.
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:46 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Speaking of complexity, evolution/camel (and maybe Gnome?) do a kind
> of
> objects with C. Why not just use C++? Was the C++ toolchain too
> unreliable at the start, or was there some other reason?
I didn't mean to exclude other alternativ
I'm preserving the exchange for context; my responses are sprinkled
below.
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 23:47 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 15:55 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Second question: even if it c
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:47 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:48 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:57 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > > I'm going to make an overview of camel-lite so that if people read the
> > > discussions here, that they know w
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:48 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:57 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > I'm going to make an overview of camel-lite so that if people read the
> > discussions here, that they know what it's all about.
> >
> > Camel-lite is the fork of Camel that
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:54 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 10:57 +0300, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
> > * "All" compilation warnings fixed (we usually compile with -Wall and
> >-Werror). Fixing this caused four major bug fixes in initialisation
> > of variables
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:57 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I'm going to make an overview of camel-lite so that if people read the
> discussions here, that they know what it's all about.
>
> Camel-lite is the fork of Camel that Tinymail is using internally right
> now. Camel-lite's code is in my o
Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 10:57 +0300, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
> * "All" compilation warnings fixed (we usually compile with -Wall and
>-Werror). Fixing this caused four major bug fixes in initialisation
> of variables in Camel.
ok, right away, let me just say evo team is interested in f
I'm going to make an overview of camel-lite so that if people read the
discussions here, that they know what it's all about.
Camel-lite is the fork of Camel that Tinymail is using internally right
now. Camel-lite's code is in my opinion not really in a good shape, it
more or less implements certai
14 matches
Mail list logo
