Re: [Evolution-hackers] improved rfc2047 decode patch

2007-12-26 Thread jacky
It seem that your patch don't support this kind of encoded string: =?gb2312?b?wrote: > This patch is a port of my GMime rfc2047 decoder > which is even more > liberal in what it accepts than Thunderbird and is > what I will be > committing to svn. > > closing bugs: > > #302991 > #315513 > #50217

Re: [Evolution-hackers] improved rfc2047 decode patch

2007-12-26 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 00:20 +0800, jacky wrote: > It seem that your patch don't support this kind of > encoded string: > =?gb2312?b? Two encoded-words are not separated by any character. Are you sure? I wrote the code to be able to handle this case and I just tested it again (noticed that I didn'

Re: [Evolution-hackers] improved rfc2047 decode patch

2007-12-26 Thread jacky
--- Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 00:20 +0800, jacky wrote: > > It seem that your patch don't support this kind of > > encoded string: > > > =?gb2312?b? > Two encoded-words are not separated by any > character. > > Are you sure? I wrote the code to be able