On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:43 -0400, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 21:14 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Unless something radical happens in the next few weeks to resolve
all these problems, I regret to say that this Ubuntu Long-Term
Support release will not be anywhere close to
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 08:08 -0700, George Farris wrote:
I completely agree. I know of myself and at least two others running
Hardy with Evolution Exchange backend and it is unusable because the
exchange backend keeps dying.
Are you on 32bit or 64bit systems? Do you have multiple CPUs?
It
On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used
a different TZID after changing the timezone definition. Alternatively
it could have sent a more complex
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 13:15 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
I can't figure out what's different about Hardy that's causing this
problem.
There was a major update to Hardy today that included all parts of
Evolution, including e-d-s and evolution-exchange. The bugs listed
there looked very serious:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:54 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
There was a major update to Hardy today that included all parts of
Evolution, including e-d-s and evolution-exchange. The bugs listed
there looked very serious: freeing null pointers and other really
unpleasant things. There haven't been
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 04:03 +0200, HggdH wrote:
The fixes came from upstream indeed. They are fixes that were
committed from about March 10th to April 7th (i.e., from the 2.22.00
release to 2.22.1).
OK, gotcha. I incorrectly assumed that 2.22.1 was already in Hardy.
I'll give it a good
Hello,
I used Paul Smith's Makefile ([1]) to build Evolution on Ubuntu Hardy
(by the way, the easiest way to build evo from SVN I have seen so
far...).
The original Makefile does not address Hardy (stops at Gutsy), so I made
a quick patch for it. I did not stop to check the prereqs, but Gutsy
