On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:22 +0100, Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> From looking at the examples, am I right in thinking that
> gtkhtml/components/editor is essentially a "plain", embeddable GTK+
> widget, and the html-editor is a bonobo component, requiring all the
> CORBA plumbing? If so, I think I'll
Hi
From the 2.24 tar package and svn trunk, I can still find the COPYING
file which says that it is "GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE v2". But from
NEWS, it says "Evolution source code license changed to LGPLv2 & LGPLV3
(Sankar P)".
Sankar, I'm curious about whether evolution still contains GPLv2
Jeff,
The COPYING (GPLv2) old license, COPYING.LGPLv2 COPYING.LGPLv3 are
present in the tarballs. Evolution still has some files left & not moved
to LGPLv2/LGPLv3. NEWs files might have been saying that some license
changes code went in. Sorry for the confusion.
-Srini.
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:
Srini,
So in current state, Evolution is still combined by GPL and
LGPLv2/LGPLv3 code, right? The target is LGPLv3/LGPLv3 only, isn't it?
Thanks,
Harry
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 08:42 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> The COPYING (GPLv2) old license, COPYING.LGPLv2 COPYING.LGPLv3
