[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.28.3 - change default mail folder (continued)

2010-08-05 Thread Joop Beekmans
Hi, I'm trying to move all the local stored (Ubuntu lucid) Evolution mail- and other relevant data to a Network Storage device, so I can get to my mail, contacts and calendar from a centralized point in the house. First I simply tried to softlink the .evolution directory to the new location (NFS)

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Camel.HttpStream in the wild (?)

2010-08-05 Thread Stef Walter
> From: Christian Hilberg > > Hi again, > > On Wednesday 04 August 2010 Christian Hilberg wrote: >> On Wednesday, 04 August 2010, Matthew Barnes wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:03 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Is there any good alternative to using libsoup which makes use of NSS?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel IMAPX RFC5464 compliance

2010-08-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:22 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: > Now, I would like to know how we should deal with the issue. We (the > evolution-kolab developers) could patch the 2.30 version of IMAPX only to get > things running. In this case, would our additions be pulled upstream? > As an alte

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Camel.HttpStream in the wild (?)

2010-08-05 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 18:30 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: > Result: While libsoup should build against the current GnuTLS lib > (development > version, 2.11.0), which has PKCS #11 support since a few weeks now, libsoup > has no infrastructure for handling client certificates at all [1] and Gnu

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-kolab: Camel.HttpStream in the wild (?)

2010-08-05 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi again, On Wednesday 04 August 2010 Christian Hilberg wrote: > On Wednesday, 04 August 2010, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:03 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: > > > Is there any good alternative to using libsoup which makes use of NSS? > > > We're pretty much depending on the