Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-09 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:49 +0200, sean finney wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:23:01PM +0530, Chenthill wrote: > > > Be sure that parsing bdata is a pain, and always will, > > > especially when you already are in a database world, where are tables > > > and relations between them pretty common

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-09 Thread Chenthill
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 10:01 +0200, sean finney wrote: > Hi Milan, > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:56:10AM +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > > As I already said seanus on irc, I will be evaluating the performance > > > between having vcards as files Vs having it in db and then choose the > > > one which

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-09 Thread Chenthill
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 08:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > (Please do not reply to me, reply to the list, I read the list and I > prefer to Ctrl+L while your message avoids this feature for me. Thanks > for your understanding.) > > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 12:23 +0530, Chenthill wrote: > > > you scary me

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (summarize ][) New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-09 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:37 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > So here left basically three things, >a) merging some API in utils, >b) getting well-known properties, >c) setting well-known properties Hi, I just did a commit into the eclient branch with a fix for b) and c). There is a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (summarize ][) New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-09 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mo, 2011-05-09 at 17:00 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:37 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > So here left basically three things, > >a) merging some API in utils, > >b) getting well-known properties, > >c) setting well-known properties > > Hi, > I just did a co

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (summarize ][) New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-09 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Why duplicate the LOADED/ONLINE/READONLY/CACHE_DIR/CAPABILITIES > properties? They could be defined as common E_CLIENT_BACKEND_ > properties. It's just because of (so called) consistency. With merging common error codes into E_CLIENT_ERROR_

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (summarize ][) New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-05-09 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:49 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > It's just because of (so called) consistency. With merging common error > codes into E_CLIENT_ERROR_ "namespace" I realized that checking for > particular errors will not be that easy as is now, because one might > have two switches, one for d