On Mo, 2011-05-16 at 18:06 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I'll do it as uid[\nrid] so that entries without an rid continue to
look exactly like the current ones.
Looks good. I ran my KCal-EDS test program which adds, modifies and
removes events, including parent and child (= detached recurrence) in
On Do, 2011-04-28 at 15:16 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Attached the resulting patch. Note that with the patch applied, all new
contacts in a Berkley DB get the simpler IDs, unconditionally. Older
contacts continue to use their existing IDs. Would something like this
be acceptable upstream?
Any
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 15:16 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
As part of wrapping QtContacts around EDS [1] I ran into the same issue
that Nokia already encountered in their Maemo 5 [2] backend: EDS uses
strings as ID, QtContacts 32 bit integers.
Nokia solved that by setting up an in-memory hash
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:51 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 13:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:04 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 12:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Even if we *didn't* have immediate plans to use other back ends
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:51 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 13:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:04 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 12:38 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Even if we *didn't* have immediate plans to use other back ends
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 18:49 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:51 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
| Further work if you agree in principle:
| * let clients query whether all contacts have the simplified ID -
|could be done with the dynamic capabilities that I mentioned
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I haven checked if other backend's would need this virtual function
though. Maybe webdav might use it ?
And then what? Build and maintain out-of-tree MeeGo versions of all
backends? Quite frankly, patching the existing backends sounds
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 16:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I'm not sure if I got it right, but such workarounds are just wrong from
my point of view. You cannot force servers to use certain types of IDs
because of constraints given by application
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:19 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Di, 2011-05-17 at 16:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I'm not sure if I got it right, but such workarounds are just
wrong from my point of view. You cannot force servers to use
