Re: [Evolution-hackers] Communication with e-d-s

2005-10-18 Thread Dick Kniep
Anyone? Op zaterdag 15 oktober 2005 20:59, schreef Dick Kniep: Hi list, This is my first post to this list, and I am definitely no wizard in Bonobo or evolution. On the other hand I have done a fair amount of searching on the Internet, so I hope you have an answer to this fairly basic

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [CAMEL] CamelStore create_folder() name constraints...

2005-10-18 Thread Jules Colding
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 11:13 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:02 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 16:24 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:13 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: Is it guaranteed that no sub-folder with the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [CAMEL] CamelStore create_folder() name constraints...

2005-10-18 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:05 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: OK. So the point is that _most_ backend servers wont allow it, but that _some_ servers might allow it. I should therefore check that no identically named folder exist and refuse to create an identically named sibling, as a matter of

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Communication with e-d-s

2005-10-18 Thread vseguip
Now I think it is best to use bonobo to connect to the e-d-s. But because I have no experience in doing this, and do not program in C, (only Python), I would be very happy if someone could give me an example on how to do this. The only documentation I found gives .h files for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [CAMEL] CamelStore create_folder() name constraints...

2005-10-18 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 11:29 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:40 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:05 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: Forcing unique sibling folder names on creation will partly solve the dilemma, but what should happen when