[Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Irene
Hi, Harish I built evolution 2.6 on my Solaris X86 the other day. The build process was successful, however, as soon as I started evolution-2.6, it crashed. We investigated this problem and arrived at the following conclusions: camel_vee_folder_hash_folder in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Ross Burton
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote: Currently, the MD5Context structures in evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and evolution/e-utils/md5-utils.h are different with the first one not having a doByteReverse member. Hm, that would be my fault: I've been working with

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Ross Burton
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:19 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote: Currently, the MD5Context structures in evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and evolution/e-utils/md5-utils.h are different with the first one not having a doByteReverse

[Evolution-hackers] Re: About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote: Hi, Harish I built evolution 2.6 on my Solaris X86 the other day. The build process was successful, however, as soon as I started evolution-2.6, it crashed. We investigated this problem and arrived at the following conclusions:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:27 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:19 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote: Currently, the MD5Context structures in evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and evolution/e-utils/md5-utils.h are

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Irene
Hi, Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in evolution-data-server/libedataserver. We are worried that in the future, if files in libedataserver are modified with their counterparts in e-util unchanged, more

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in evolution-data-server/libedataserver. Yes. To be more precise, evolution-exchange in addition to e-util and libedataserver :-). I've created a wiki page

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Ross Burton
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:49 +0530, Shreyas Sriniavasan wrote: On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:48 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils

2005-11-24 Thread Tor Lillqvist
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 18:57 +, Ross Burton wrote: As evolution obviously depends on libedataserver already, surely for the files which are identical there is no problem at all? My thoughts exactly. I couldn't control myself, sorry, and went ahead with one of the duplicates: I changed the