Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sending mails using disabled accounts

2005-11-30 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
Hey Philip, On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 00:38 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: It looks like current CVS does not allow sending E-mails uing disabled accounts. I very often disable E-mail accounts to make it possible to choose between multiple of my E-mail addresses. Why is this possibility

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sending mails using disabled accounts

2005-11-30 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:49 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: Hey Philip, On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 00:38 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: It looks like current CVS does not allow sending E-mails uing disabled accounts. I very often disable E-mail accounts to make it possible to choose

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel_header_unfold()

2005-11-30 Thread Jules Colding
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 10:25 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Might be nitpicking, but RFC 2822 says: The process of moving from this folded multiple-line representation of a header field to its single line representation is called unfolding. Unfolding is accomplished by simply

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sending mails using disabled accounts

2005-11-30 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
Hey Andre, On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 02:20 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: hi philip, Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2005, 00:38 +0100 schrieb Philip Van Hoof: It looks like current CVS does not allow sending E-mails uing disabled accounts. I very often disable E-mail accounts to make it possible to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sending mails using disabled accounts

2005-11-30 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:54 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:42 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: So how do I solve my situation then? ;-) I have multiple E-mail accounts that I use for sending. But only a few real 'mailboxes' for receiving. Some of the E-mail

[Evolution-hackers] NewMail notification from folder.changed event

2005-11-30 Thread karllinuxtest.relton
Hi all I am looking into the bug I reported (bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322016) regarding the new mail notification dbus message - which is sent via the plugin based on the folder.changed event. The basic problem is that the folder.changed event is documented as a generic event on any

[Evolution-hackers] Re: NewMail notification from folder.changed event

2005-11-30 Thread karllinuxtest.relton
Looking at the code, I see that the folder.changed event is passed an EMEventTargetFolder structure, which is contains a flag EM_EVENT_FOLDER_NEWMAIL (although curiously this flag is inverted in em_event_target_new_folder() - not sure why). Therefore the plugin code in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] exchange connector question

2005-11-30 Thread chen
You can do that through Evolution-data-server. There was some discussion regarding communication with EDS, you can find those mail threads here http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2005-October/msg00070.html. thanks, Chenthill. On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 16:21 +0100, Ron Arts wrote:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] exchange connector question

2005-11-30 Thread Andre Klapper
hi ron, you can find some general information on the evolution data server architecture at http://go-evolution.org/EDS_Architecture cheers, andre Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2005, 23:40 +0530 schrieb chen: You can do that through Evolution-data-server. There was some discussion regarding

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sending mails using disabled accounts

2005-11-30 Thread Brett Johnson
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 14:34 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:54 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:42 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: [...] Example: My gnome e-mail address isn't a real e-mail address with a mailbox attached. It gets delivered