On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 12:10 +0100, Stefan Schmitt wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 13:57 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > I think that the GNOME clock uses this trick too. I'd be interested in
> > seeing the correct way to do it in C.
>
> I'll start working on this today. At the moment I'm trying
> At gentoo, we patched the gtkhtml-2.13.90 tarball. A new one would be
> nice, but is not necessary.
>
fwiw, I rolled out Gtkhtml-2.13.90.1 tarballs yesterday that have
Matthias' fix for the pango issue.
Regards,
Harish
___
Evolution-hackers maili
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 12:15 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 14:09 +0530, chen wrote:
> >
> > Now the file org-gnome-mail-to-task.xml will not be added in the
> > tarballs. The menu item will not appear in the evolution main menu under
> > Message. Is there any reason for
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 14:09 +0530, chen wrote:
>
> Now the file org-gnome-mail-to-task.xml will not be added in the
> tarballs. The menu item will not appear in the evolution main menu under
> Message. Is there any reason for this commit and was it approved by
> anyone ?
>
As per Kjartan's comm
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 13:50 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 1/31/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gtkhtml does some unkosher things with PangoGlyphItems,
> > and recent pango changes have turned that into a crash:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329344
> >
> > I
