[Evolution-hackers] camel_folder_transfer_messages_to(): Provider assumptions?

2006-02-28 Thread Jules Colding
Hi, Can I assume anything regarding the source and dest folders below? void camel_folder_transfer_messages_to(CamelFolder *source, GPtrArray *uids, CamelFolder *dest, GPtrArray

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel_folder_transfer_messages_to(): Provider assumptions?

2006-02-28 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
transfer_messages_to : is called when messages are moved between folders within a store append_message : is called when messages are moved from folder of another store to *your* store (which implements the append_message). HTH, partha On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 11:08 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: Hi,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel_folder_transfer_messages_to(): Provider assumptions?

2006-02-28 Thread Jules Colding
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:00 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: transfer_messages_to : is called when messages are moved between folders within a store append_message : is called when messages are moved from folder of another store to *your* store (which implements the append_message).

RE: [Evolution-hackers] Announce : Evolution 2.5.92, EDS 1.5.92, Evolution-exchange 2.5.92 and Gtkhtml 3.9.92

2006-02-28 Thread Paul Hands
As with the prvious (2.5.91) release, I get many, many syntax erros trying to compile gtkhtml. The configure step goes fine, but make fails with syntax errors some way through, which I have no idea how to tackle. Any hints gratefully appreciated.. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..

RE: [Evolution-hackers] Announce : Evolution 2.5.92, EDS 1.5.92, Evolution-exchange 2.5.92 and Gtkhtml 3.9.92

2006-02-28 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
Hi Paul, This is a pretty common error (atleast to me, as I keep getting this very often) caused because of a stray glibconfig.h file in prefix/gnome/include. Just move this glibconfig.h to some-other-unwanted-name or just delete it. HTH, V. Varadhan Paul Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/28/06

[Evolution-hackers] Broken on building Gtkhtml

2006-02-28 Thread simon.zheng
Hi, I Just updated the code and built, then got the following error Undefined first referenced symbol in file next_uri./.libs/libgtkhtml-3.8.so

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel.Store or Camel.Folder sync()

2006-02-28 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 15:21 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: Hi, Both methods seem to be designed to do the same wrt deleted messages - namely to expunge them if the option is set. Where should I put the expunge functionality? In the store implementation or in the folder implementation??

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Broken on building Gtkhtml

2006-02-28 Thread jeff cai
Simon: I think the problem has been resolved. Jeff Cai On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 12:14 +0800, simon.zheng wrote: Hi, I Just updated the code and built, then got the following error Undefined first

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel.Store or Camel.Folder sync()

2006-02-28 Thread Jules Colding
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 11:19 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 15:21 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: Hi, Both methods seem to be designed to do the same wrt deleted messages - namely to expunge them if the option is set. Where should I put the expunge

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel.Store or Camel.Folder sync()

2006-02-28 Thread Parthasarathi Susarla
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 08:51 +0100, Jules Colding wrote: Yes sure, but my question was more directed towards the expunge functionality of sync(). Both camel_store_sync() and camel_folder_sync() have an option for expunging folders. The functionality is therefore shared between the Camel.Store