On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:44 -0400, Teresa Thomas wrote:
Need some assistance in my quest to comprehend EDS.
What exactly is the difference between e_cal_create_object() [in
ECalComponent] and e_cal_create_object() [in ECal ] ?
e_cal_create_object is used to create a appointment, task or a
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 16:24 -0400, Teresa Thomas wrote:
Thanks Andre, I have been looking at that EDS architecture details but
it just gives a general picture.
I am having starting troubles with EDS. Just so I can get started,
does anyone have any sample code that exposes the events/tasks
Hi Philip,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext
Philip Van Hoof
[]
For you, attached and on a plate:
o. The patch for evolution-data-server
o. The patch for evolution-exchange
Trying to get this upstream is, for
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:32 +, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Novell already has a bunch of LDTP stuff to test the Evo mailer from
the
user's viewpooint - run those tests on the patched version to see how
well they work. [Varadhan, those tests are already part of our QA
process, aren't
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 23:05 +, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
If Novell wants me to implement unit tests (or other tests) for this,
I
will ask for payment.
I am afraid that you won't get paid as Camel already has a
neat-test-suite and can be used/extended, IMO. ;-)
V. Varadhan
Novell, Inc.
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:32 +, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
1. Branch evolution-data-server into HEAD (development, with Philip's
patch), and the stable branch (without the patch).
I have created a branch exclusively for the camel mmap summary work,
viz., mmapped-camel-summary-branch
Hi,
I've some question about the camel-private.h
Why is it a no-inst header according to the Makefile.am?
As far as i know almost every provider depends on it.
Is there a reason or is it just a mistake?
Serjan Pruis
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 14:36 +0200, Smartuser wrote:
Hi,
I've some question about the camel-private.h
Why is it a no-inst header according to the Makefile.am?
As far as i know almost every provider depends on it.
Is there a reason or is it just a mistake?
Serjan Pruis
As the name
camel/providers like for example: groupwise uses CAMEL_SERVICE_LOCK which is
declared in the camel-private.h file. So it doesn't seem private to me.
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 15:00, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 14:36 +0200, Smartuser wrote:
Hi,
I've some question about
I'm going to attempt to conclude this mini-thread that got extended to
other mailing lists.
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 02:45 -0600, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
I have created a branch exclusively for the camel mmap summary work,
viz., mmapped-camel-summary-branch which will help Phillip to continue
Thanks Mr Palanisamy!My Bad, I actually meant to ask about the function e_cal_component_new() in ECalComponent.h/c. Anyway, from what I understand it returns an ECalComponent, which is an (easier to manipulate) wrapper around an iCalComponent.
On 7/19/06, chenthill palanisamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 09:53 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 01:10 -0600, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 23:05 +, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
If Novell wants me to implement unit tests (or other tests) for this,
I will ask for payment.
I am
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 17:40 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
... On the other hand, Philip, next time we meet in person I'll happily
buy you dinner :)
oh ... what about Boston? :)
I'll check with my daytime employer whether it's okay if I can visit the
Summit.
I don't know for sure
Well, I figured out why you're getting alignment problems... you're
using int* pointers to decode stuff. You need to use a char*
Secondly, your code is just really gross:
- Why do you have a filepos pointer? it's completely unnecessary.
- Why do you use a ptr32 thing? That's gross. There are
14 matches
Mail list logo
