Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 3/3] Add some missing includes

2006-08-15 Thread Tor Lillqvist
må 2006-08-14 klockan 19:58 -0400 skrev Pavel Roskin: From: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- a/widgets/misc/e-icon-entry.c +++ b/widgets/misc/e-icon-entry.c @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ #include e-icon-entry.h #include gtk/gtkentry.h #include gtk/gtkbox.h #include gtk/gtkhbox.h +#include

[Evolution-hackers] Help needed with CamelFolderInfo to CamelFolder

2006-08-15 Thread Smartuser
Hello, I've to add a new message to a folder, but the only things i have are CamelStore and the CamelFolderInfo of the folder. With test-full_name for example i can get the folder name. That looks oke to me. I also look it op in my priv-id_hash. So the folder exists. But now there already is

Re: [Evolution-hackers] URL colour in Mail

2006-08-15 Thread Harry Lu
From gtkhtml/src/htmlcolorset.c's html_colorset_set_style(), it seems should be link_color instead of link-color. Calum, What API could we use to get the gtk theme setings for URL colors? Thanks, Harry On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:38 +0100, Calum Benson wrote: On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 10:01

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Help needed with CamelFolderInfo to CamelFolder

2006-08-15 Thread Smartuser
Hi, Do I got this right? It looks like folder = camel_store_get_folder(store, lpParentInfo-full_name, 0, ex); does the job. On Tuesday 15 August 2006 12:44, Smartuser wrote: Hello, I've to add a new message to a folder, but the only things i have are CamelStore and the CamelFolderInfo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] URL colour in Mail

2006-08-15 Thread Calum Benson
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 20:09 +0800, Harry Lu wrote: From gtkhtml/src/htmlcolorset.c's html_colorset_set_style(), it seems should be link_color instead of link-color. Calum, What API could we use to get the gtk theme setings for URL colors? Not sure, I'm not exactly a programmer :)

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 3/3] Add some missing includes

2006-08-15 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
the original idea was to speed up compile time On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 08:50 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: må 2006-08-14 klockan 19:58 -0400 skrev Pavel Roskin: From: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- a/widgets/misc/e-icon-entry.c +++ b/widgets/misc/e-icon-entry.c @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 3/3] Add some missing includes

2006-08-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Tor! On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 08:50 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: må 2006-08-14 klockan 19:58 -0400 skrev Pavel Roskin: +#include gtk/gtkeventbox.h +#include gtk/gtkimage.h Isn't the correct thing here to just include gtk/gtk.h and not attempt to hand-pick individual gtk headers?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 3/3] Add some missing includes

2006-08-15 Thread Tor Lillqvist
ti 2006-08-15 klockan 10:18 -0400 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: the original idea was to speed up compile time Sure, I can guess that, but is it worth it? Some timings would be interesting, but on the other hand, it can't be worth spending time on doing such timings... --tml

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 3/3] Add some missing includes

2006-08-15 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Zucchi did timings a while back and found it to be worth it *shrug* I don't have the timings on me tho, so I have no idea what kind of difference it made. On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:20 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: ti 2006-08-15 klockan 10:18 -0400 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: the original idea was to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 3/3] Add some missing includes

2006-08-15 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 11:16 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Zucchi did timings a while back and found it to be worth it *shrug* I don't have the timings on me tho, so I have no idea what kind of difference it made. If only partial APIs are going to be #include'd in Evolution source files,