[Evolution-hackers] SyncML for mail (was: Re: automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution)

2006-10-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 14:49 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 22:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > I have not mentioned it on this list before, so before I come to the > > real reason for this email let me introduce it briefly: SyncEvolution[1] > > is a SyncML client that I w

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Recurrence ID?

2006-10-17 Thread chenthill
Hi Jules, The format of the recurrence id (datetime value) is the same as that is specified in rfc 2445. thanks, Chenthill. On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:49 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > Hi, > > What is the format of the recurrence ID (const char *rid) as used in > get_object(), remove_object()

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution

2006-10-17 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 22:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > I have not mentioned it on this list before, so before I come to the > real reason for this email let me introduce it briefly: SyncEvolution[1] > is a SyncML client that I wrote to synchronize address books, calendars > and tasks list betwee

Re: [Evolution-hackers] OWA with "SessionGuard" [OT]

2006-10-17 Thread Jules Colding
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:58 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 12:33 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > > I'm interested in extracting the Camel-only parts of a Camel provider > > > for distribution in tinymail (which is LGPL). > > > > OK, just bear in mind that Brutus is GPL. > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] OWA with "SessionGuard" [OT]

2006-10-17 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 12:33 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: > > Could Brutus be used for accessing Exchange services using just Camel? > Yes, I would think so. Something like this has been done before using > the calendar parts of e-d-s: > http://www.omesc.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=35 Gre

Re: [Evolution-hackers] OWA with "SessionGuard" [OT]

2006-10-17 Thread Jules Colding
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 12:12 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 18:25 +0530, Ritesh Khadgaray wrote: > > Off track, check out http://www.omesc.com/ for evolution-brutus . > > Could Brutus be used for accessing Exchange services using just Camel? Yes, I would think so. Something

Re: [Evolution-hackers] OWA with "SessionGuard" [OT]

2006-10-17 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 18:25 +0530, Ritesh Khadgaray wrote: > Off track, check out http://www.omesc.com/ for evolution-brutus . Could Brutus be used for accessing Exchange services using just Camel? I'm interested in extracting the Camel-only parts of a Camel provider for distribution in tinymail

[Evolution-hackers] Building Evolution Exchange from HEAD / with Evolution 2.9.x

2006-10-17 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
Hi, As noted in my previous mail, there was no new release of the Evolution Exchange module along with Evolution 2.9.1 and Evolution-Data-Server 1.9.1. as we had no changes to the source/translations since the previous release. However, in case you are building Evolution Exchange from HEAD alon