Re: [Evolution-hackers] [ANNOUNCE} Evolution 2.9.3 and Evolution-Data-Server 1.9.3 released (with GtkHTML 3.12.3 and Evolution-Exchange-2.9.3)

2006-12-05 Thread William Murray
Hello Harish, I get problems with evolution-exchange. I have been using ldap from evo-openldap-2.1.23-1.ximian.9.1, but this does not include LDAP_CONTROL_PAGEDRESULTS which is now required. If I use the standard Fedora 6 ldap (openldap-2.3.27-4) I do not have ntlm, so this is no

[Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-05 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
Hi fellow hackers, With reference to Bug 380534 on clarifying Evolution's library requirements, I am putting down my thoughts and recommendations here and will be proposing this in the weekly evolution meeting (#evolution-meet on irc.gimp.org at 1000 UTC 6 Dec 2006) tomorrow. Comments/questions

Re: [Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-05 Thread Matthew Barnes
I'll respond here since I may not be up in time for the 6 a.m. meeting tomorrow. Great feedback overall, just have a few comments. On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:51 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: On (a) Inbound Dependencies, I suggest that on upstream CVS, Evolution should depend on the most

Re: [Evolution-hackers] RFC: Evolution's library requirements

2006-12-05 Thread Ross Burton
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:28 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: I suggest that on upstream CVS, Evolution should depend on the most recent stable versions of the libraries available in the corresponding GNOME release (Evolution 2.9.x/2.8.x on GNOME 2.16, 2.6.x on GNOME 2.14). This is similar but