[Evolution-hackers] The recent camel-lite improvements

2007-02-07 Thread Philip Van Hoof
I'm of course planning to get this stuff upstream. But I have to warn the dreamers. A lot of it is/was done as a hack. That's because I envision that someday I actually will switch from using Camel to most likely fejj's libspruce. With Camel this was for the last feature, IDLE support, almost

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The recent camel-lite improvements

2007-02-07 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:36 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: [snip...] The very simple reason is lack of interest. Whenever I posted a patch in the past, it took months before somebody even touched the status of the bug, commented on it or even took a look at it. This has nothing to do with time

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The recent camel-lite improvements

2007-02-07 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:58 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:36 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: Of all those features/implementations that you have mentioned so far, I could list 2 of them fit the interest of evolution - mmap (without summary format changes - adding

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The recent camel-lite improvements

2007-02-07 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
It'd be nice to see the work for IDLE make it to mainline too. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers