[Evolution-hackers] Upgrade path from 2.6 to 2.10

Are there any changes in the data format between 2.6 and 2.10.1? Or anything else that may cause trouble without installing 2.8 in between? We're considering to package 2.10.1 as a replacement for 2.6.3 in the Debian distributions. If there are any possible upgrade problems, we'd like to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gtkhtml API version

On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 16:51 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: What happened to the gtkhtml API versioning before the GNOME 2.18 release? Seems like it was a mistake to do the bump in http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtkhtml/trunk/configure.in?r1=8408r2=8425 It is not the new strategy to bump

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Upgrade path from 2.6 to 2.10

On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 13:24 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: Are there any changes in the data format between 2.6 and 2.10.1? Or anything else that may cause trouble without installing 2.8 in between? We're considering to package 2.10.1 as a replacement for 2.6.3 in the Debian distributions. If

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gtkhtml API version

2007/4/14, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 16:51 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: What happened to the gtkhtml API versioning before the GNOME 2.18 release? Seems like it was a mistake to do the bump in