Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2007-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 21:49 +, JP Rosevear wrote: On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 15:03 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, I discovered last week that there is an attempt to resurrect libical from non-maintainership, merge all of the patches from various forks, and start making sane releases

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, It will be great if you can mail the details on the address book stuff as well. I would like the libebook clients like OOo, etc to comment on this. -Srini. On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-21 Thread Jules Colding
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patch to libecal[1], which removes private functions and types from the installed headers. This has several consequences: - e_cal_view_new() is removed -

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Ross, From the current discussion, it looks like we are safe. Can we do something like this for this release before we dung them out? #ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED #include bonobo/bonobo-object.h #endif -Srini. On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 10:32 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:15 +0530,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-21 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 11:33 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: From the current discussion, it looks like we are safe. Can we do something like this for this release before we dung them out? #ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED #include bonobo/bonobo-object.h #endif The patches consist of removing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 11:33 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: #ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED #include bonobo/bonobo-object.h #endif Just FYI, EDS_DISABLE_DEPRECATED is what Gtk-Doc looks for. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list

[Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers, it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s release was followed by a SVN tag creation in module_name/tags. These tags are very useful for you, maintainers but also for contributors and vendors when they try to search for changes between

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers, it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s release was followed by a SVN tag creation in module_name/tags. These tags are very useful for you, maintainers but also for

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers, it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s release was followed by a SVN tag creation in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers, it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution /

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Hi Evolution / E-D-S

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Frederic, One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to map the svn revision number to a particular release. I hope isn't so difficult to get that from the ChangeLog/configure.in/NEWS commit logs. At least that is how we do while preparing NEWS file for a dot release to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:39 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:36 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Frederic, One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to map the svn revision number to a particular release. I hope isn't so difficult to get that from the ChangeLog/configure.in/NEWS commit logs. At

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

2007-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:38 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 11:33 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: From the current discussion, it looks like we are safe. Can we do something like this for this release before we dung them out? #ifdef E_D_S_DEPRECATED #include

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 18:57 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:36 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Frederic, One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to map the svn revision number to a particular release. I hope isn't so difficult to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:57 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 18:57 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 16:36 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Frederic, One reason why me and Harish didn't want to tag is that we are able to map the svn

Re: [Evolution-hackers] e_contact_get_const api doesn't work anymore since a few weeks on debian/unstable

2007-05-21 Thread Julien Puydt
Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:35 +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: TEL;TYPE=Home:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TEL;TYPE=Home;TYPE=VOICE:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TEL;TYPE=CELL:123.123.123.123\n See it works now. Ok, reported to the contacts developers, since it was using