Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like buttons) in 2.10 and not the other views as well (memos, calendars, contacts) In few themes, Ive seen that it looks like a table header, but not in all

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it doesn't understand _ markup. I think that can be moved to GtkTreeView and shouldn't have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:24 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like buttons) in 2.10 and not the other views as well (memos, calendars, contacts) In few

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:38 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:24 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like buttons) in 2.10 and not the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it doesn't understand _

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: I've seen that too, but the point was more: Why are the message view headers looking different

[Evolution-hackers] Calendar Maintainership

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi friends, It is with immense pleasure I announce that Christian Kellner joins Chenthill as Calendar Maintainer. He is popularly known as gicmo on IRC. Gicmo is already the maintainer of gnome-vfs. He is the author and the maintainer of evolution-scalix and the CalDAV provider for Evolution.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Calendar Maintainership

2007-05-31 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:32 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hi friends, It is with immense pleasure I announce that Christian Kellner joins Chenthill as Calendar Maintainer. He is popularly known as gicmo on IRC. Gicmo is already the maintainer of gnome-vfs. He is the author and the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] XML APIs in evolution

2007-05-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:55 +0300, Ross Burton wrote: The need for a cast is part of the (IMHO wrong) design of libxml2, the policy is that the libxml2 API requires UTF-8 strings, so they typedef xmlChar to unsigned char*. Application writers are then meant to run all strings through UTF-8

[Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an IMAP mailbox which is very large, both in terms of folders (over 100) and messages (the largest folder has 300,000 messages; my INBOX

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: I've seen that too, but the point

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi, On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an IMAP mailbox which is very large, both in terms of folders (over 100) and

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an IMAP mailbox which is very large, both in terms of folders (over 100) and

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an IMAP

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Alfredo Matos
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an IMAP

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: [Ross] What version to start with? I would prefer, if you can try it with Evolution 2.10.2. It is the most recent stable release. Is EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_1_10_2 the corresponding tag to use for evolution-data-server? -- Ross

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:22 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: [Ross] What version to start with? I would prefer, if you can try it with Evolution 2.10.2. It is the most recent stable release. Is EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_1_10_2 the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago some of the Debian packagers were interested in making a more recent version).

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 13:38 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 16:10 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:38 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago some of the Debian packagers were

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: 2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:22 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: That sounds as if no upgrade of other apps would be forced. Or did you mean the stuff the evolution and gtk+ depends on would all need to go to newer versions? That's probably a lot of stuff, but it's not so bad. Hard to predict. You can

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/5/31, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: 2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo