Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 01:53 +0300, Philip Van Hoof a écrit : Without immediately writing to disk work, the download by itself will consume around 120 MB of RAM, and will most likely fail due to network timeouts and other such problems (it'll take a while, since Evolution fetches a ridiculous

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 08:25 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 01:53 +0300, Philip Van Hoof a écrit : Without immediately writing to disk work, the download by itself will consume around 120 MB of RAM, and will most likely fail due to network timeouts and other such

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Sankar P
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 08:25 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 01:53 +0300, Philip Van Hoof a écrit : Without immediately writing to disk work, the download by itself will consume around 120 MB of RAM, and

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 03:05 -0600, Sankar P wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: It improves the situation by setting your url-string to have the basic_headers option. In the imap code of Camel, it will then ask for less headers (but still way too much).

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Sankar P
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 12:28 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 03:05 -0600, Sankar P wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: It improves the situation by setting your url-string to have the basic_headers option. In the imap code of Camel, it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Ritesh Khadgaray
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 04:56 -0600, Sankar P wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 12:28 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 03:05 -0600, Sankar P wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: It improves the situation by setting your url-string to have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:56 +0300, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 08:25 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 01:53 +0300, Philip Van Hoof a écrit : Without immediately writing to disk work, the download by itself will consume around 120 MB of RAM, and

[Evolution-hackers] introduction and an offering

2007-06-07 Thread Roy Pittman
This is my first post to this list. I have been reading it for a while and have a script to offer to all of you but am unsure if this is the right place. Any guidance will be welcome. The problem: it is not convenient to move contacts information from MS Outlook to Evolution. My solution: