Hi,
I was wondering if imap shared folders support in evolution was planned.
It was working at some point when choosing imap IV server protocol,
but it seems removed in recent versions.
Regards,
Thomas Cataldo.
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:42 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
Hi all;
I just uploaded a new version of my Makefile to build Evo from SVN.
This version allows for building the current SVN trunk HEAD (up until
today I was building on the 2.20 branch).
Really excellent I must say.
Thanks,
jules
Hello everyone,
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
Evolution 2.22
GtkHTML 3.22
Evolution Data Server 1.22
Evolution Exchange 2.22
There won't be any
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
Evolution 2.22
GtkHTML 3.22
Evolution Data Server
Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2007, 13:43 +0200 schrieb Jules Colding:
Does it really matter? But, well, I doesn't care so please go ahead...
it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version corresponds
to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and other modules
(i'm happy that atk,
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
Evolution 2.22
GtkHTML 3.22
Evolution Data Server
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 14:17 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
it does. it's annoying that i have to remember which version
corresponds to which gnome release for gtk+, glib, evofriends and
other modules (i'm happy that atk, at-spi gail already switched to
the gnome versioning a few months back),
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:03 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20). I feel that it would be
fine, if we just sync the minor versions.
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
Applications that link to E-D-S would have to be recompiled obviously,
but as long as they're using pkgconfig correctly they should not require
any code changes (I think).
I knew this claim would come back to bite me. The pkgconfig
Matthew,
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 16:51 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 12:53 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 11:31 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
There have been many requests regarding syncing the versions of
Evolution (currently 2.12) and GNOME (2.20).
Ross,
Even I would have loved this if we can get all the friends to be 2.22.
Unfortunately GtkHTML can't be 2.22 as it is already 3.xx. I felt that
synchronizing the minor versions is fine. I'm not really against it, if
there aren't any major objections to this.
-Srini.
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at
12 matches
Mail list logo
