Hi
What I want to do was to add this action in the mailing filters ( like
"Move to folder", "Set status"... they are in in
filtertypes.xml ), but I was told this is not possible.
I was also told that modifying the subject of a mail, or the "display"
of the subject of this mail in evolution, is
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 14:26 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> try rev 35503
compilation completes now.
thanks - reid
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
try rev 35503
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 13:51 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> ...
> AMEL_PROVIDERDIR=\"\" -DPREFIX=\"/opt/evo\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"evolution-mail\"
> -ggdb -O2 -march=prescott -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -MT
> em-folder-properties.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/em-folder-proper
...
AMEL_PROVIDERDIR=\"\" -DPREFIX=\"/opt/evo\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"evolution-mail\"
-ggdb -O2 -march=prescott -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -MT
em-folder-properties.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/em-folder-properties.Tpo -c
../../../evolution/mail/em-folder-properties.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
.l
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 18:59 +0530, svalbard colaco wrote:
> Can any on tell me how to debugg the same...Has any one come across
> these warnings...?
> And what colud be the possible approach to handle them
Run evolution under GDB and set a breakpoint at the function "g_logv".
That will make th
I guess I've probably always been aware that there was some suckage
here, but I never really knew how bad.
So the other night I was trying to implement support for tweaking cache
expiration preferences for IMAP4, but ran into some problems with
providing a decent way of providing a UI for it.
cam
Hi all
I have evolution on DFB and i get the following warnings when run;
gtkhtml-WARNING **: Cannot create spell dictionary instance
(iid:OAFIID:GNOME_Spell_Dictionary:0.3)
Spell Dictionary is not supported.
Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_icon_info_get_filename: assertion `icon_info != NULL'
failed
Bon
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:55 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> > Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was
> > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it.
> >
> Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with
> ntlm?
>
What
Hi!
Thanks for the tip. As stated, I'm a beginner both in coding and plugin
development. However, I will give it a shot after my exams.
I'll get back to this thread once and if I make any progress.
(No need to reply to me directly - I'm following the list)
Mats Taraldsvik
On Fri, 2008-05-16 a
