Re: [Evolution-hackers] External editor plugin

2008-09-17 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 08:20 -0400, Reid.Thompson wrote: On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 11:22 +0530, Sankar wrote: Will such a workflow be not best done by having vi/emacs style key-bindings for the composer body area , rather than opening a external program ? Is this being implemented/considered?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configuration masquerading Data

2008-09-17 Thread Martin Owens
I think this idea is extremely valuable and merits robust discussion to discover ways to encourage application developers to incorporate this way of approaching data storage. Thank you, I'm not always as coherent as I'd like when I describe my ideas and knowing it made sense to you gives me

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configuration masquerading Data

2008-09-17 Thread Martin Owens
Hi, I think it would be important to distinguish between a local cache of a remote IMAP or CalDAV folder (i.e. Configuration) vs. local mail folders, calendars, contact lists, etc. (Data). I agree, I regretted not making a note about cache data. Caches are temporary stores, if it makes

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Evolution: Taking forward...]

2008-09-17 Thread James Willcox
Hi, So here is the plan : * Drop Evolution copyright assignments and make it really easy to contribute to Evolution * Move Evolution licensing to LGPL v2 and LGPL v3 to let us re-use the code more easily around the platform. This also moves us closer to Thunderbird's MPL/LGPL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configuration masquerading Data

2008-09-17 Thread Remco
Shouldn't the Telepathy framework be considered for storing account settings? Remco ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

[Evolution-hackers] evolution-sharp-0.17.5 vs mono-2.0

2008-09-17 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
Hello, Trying to build evo# on mono-2.0 we get this error: /usr/bin/gacutil /i evolution-sharp.dll /f /package evolution-sharp /root /var/tmp/evolution-sharp-0.17.5-build/usr/lib Failure adding assembly evolution-sharp.dll to the cache: Strong name cannot be verified for delay-signed assembly

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configuration masquerading Data

2008-09-17 Thread Felix Kaser
Nice thoughts, really nice thoughts! But I have to defend cheese! You're right, storing the pictures in a hidden directory is not that good! The maintainer of cheese, daniel siegel implemented it this way, because he thought storing all these random-crazy-looking-pictures taken with cheese in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution: Taking forward...

2008-09-17 Thread Philip Withnall
Permission granted to relicence my code (committed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Thanks, Philip On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 04:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hello guys, We have had a set of problems that we are carrying around for some time like : * Copyright

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-17 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Since we do really want to remove the fork and pick up packages from upstream, I can change the apis in evolution related packages if a new set of apis with some suffix is provided from libical upstream. Many of you have probably already read this on the libical mailing list, but just in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configuration masquerading Data

2008-09-17 Thread Onno Benschop
On 13/09/08 11:48, Martin Owens wrote: Technically configuration directories denoted by being hidden (suffexed with a '.') are there to hold collections of configuration files for the applications which they serve. But there are plenty of programs using these directories to store the data