Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28

2009-08-12 Thread Bharath Acharya
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 04:03 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
 git branch -r does not list gnome-2-28 for the evolution project, and a
 merge failed, of course. For evolution-data-server and gtkhtml, it
 worked.

I see it branched for evolution too.
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/evolution/log/?h=gnome-2-28

I also see a commit for the branch :)

Regards,
--Bharath


 
 Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 20:20 +0530 schrieb Chenthill:
  Hi, 
We have made a early branching for evolution for GNOME 2.28. We have
  been discussing on this in the past and to have the context, please go
  through the following threads,
  
  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-August/msg8.html
  and
  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00018.html
  
  The following modules have been branched,
  gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The
  branch is gnome-2-28.
  
  Only critical fixes will be made for evolution-2.28. By critical fixes,
  I mean blockers and important bugs identified as must-fix by module
  maintainers. All freezes would apply for gnome-2-28 branch. Please note
  that these patches needs to be committed to master and gnome-2-28
  branch.
  
  The kill-bonobo-branch and eds-dbus-port will be merged into master. So
  it means master will not have any freezes. Most of the active work will
  be going on master branch to get it usable for evolution 2.29.1.
  
  Once the branches are merged to trunk, we would be replying back to this
  thread mentioning the same.
  
  We have made a rough road-map for Evolution 3.0 -
  http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo3.0  which will be discussed and modified
  further. 
  
  We will also be discussing over some pending tasks from Evolution 2.28
  and include the ones which are possible for
  http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 .
  
  
  Thanks, Chenthill.
  ___
  Evolution-hackers mailing list
  Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
 
 
 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution-hackers Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8

2009-08-12 Thread Saint yeyo




 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:32:34 +0530
 From: Bharath Acharya abhar...@novell.com
 Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28
 To: tmsta...@t-mittelstaedt.de
 Cc: evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 Message-ID: 1250064154.18684.1.ca...@abharath-os11-1.site
 Content-Type: text/plain

 On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 04:03 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
  git branch -r does not list gnome-2-28 for the evolution project, and a
  merge failed, of course. For evolution-data-server and gtkhtml, it
  worked.

 I see it branched for evolution too.
 http://git.gnome.org/cgit/evolution/log/?h=gnome-2-28

 I also see a commit for the branch :)

 Regards,
 --Bharath


 
  Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 20:20 +0530 schrieb Chenthill:
   Hi,
 We have made a early branching for evolution for GNOME 2.28. We have
   been discussing on this in the past and to have the context, please go
   through the following threads,
  
  
 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-August/msg8.html
   and
   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00018.html
  
   The following modules have been branched,
   gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The
   branch is gnome-2-28.
  
   Only critical fixes will be made for evolution-2.28. By critical fixes,
   I mean blockers and important bugs identified as must-fix by module
   maintainers. All freezes would apply for gnome-2-28 branch. Please note
   that these patches needs to be committed to master and gnome-2-28
   branch.
  
   The kill-bonobo-branch and eds-dbus-port will be merged into master. So
   it means master will not have any freezes. Most of the active work will
   be going on master branch to get it usable for evolution 2.29.1.
  
   Once the branches are merged to trunk, we would be replying back to
 this
   thread mentioning the same.
  
   We have made a rough road-map for Evolution 3.0 -
   http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo3.0  which will be discussed and
 modified
   further.
  
   We will also be discussing over some pending tasks from Evolution 2.28
   and include the ones which are possible for
   http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 .
  
  
   Thanks, Chenthill.
   ___
   Evolution-hackers mailing list
   Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
   http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
 
 
  ___
  Evolution-hackers mailing list
  Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers




 --

 Message: 4
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:17:59 +0800
 From: Saint yeyo st.y...@gmail.com
 Subject: [Evolution-hackers] how to initialize bf-priv-file_db
 To: evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 Message-ID:
5eb191c00908120217s7906140eoe702bc1ba5ae...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 hello,

 how to initialize 'bf-priv-file_db'? because db = bf-priv-file_db, but
 with NULL value always segmentation fault return,  I tried
 bf-priv-file_db
 = malloc(sizeof(DB)); but error said incomplete type, how can I do?
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/attachments/20090812/a76bfab3/attachment.html
 

 --

 Message: 5
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:03:50 +0200
 From: Gilles Dartiguelongue gilles.dartiguelon...@esiee.org
 Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
 To: Nirav Kumar kni...@novell.com
 Cc: P Chenthill pchenth...@novell.com, evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 Message-ID: 1250071430.25532.2.ca...@dhcp-16.lan.rep.sj
 Content-Type: text/plain

 can we get the new user lockdown now at least ?

 --
 Gilles Dartiguelongue gilles.dartiguelon...@esiee.org



 --

 Message: 6
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:56:30 +0200
 From: Milan Crha mc...@redhat.com
 Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] how to initialize bf-priv-file_db
 To: evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 Message-ID: 1250074590.4946.1.ca...@localhost.localdomain
 Content-Type: text/plain

 On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 17:17 +0800, Saint yeyo wrote:
  hello,
 
  how to initialize 'bf-priv-file_db'? because db = bf-priv-file_db,
  but with NULL value always segmentation fault return,  I tried
  bf-priv-file_db = malloc(sizeof(DB)); but error said incomplete
  type, how can I do?

Hi,
 maybe I will sound silly, but what type a bf is? What is its parent
 object? You know, you just give here some expression from somewhere.
 The context is missing, at least for me.
Bye,
Milan



 --

 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


 End of Evolution-hackers Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
 


   Hi,
maybe I