On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 14:22 -0400, Suman Manjunath wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 11:37 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this mean something
for evolution development? :-o
Looks like it's basically just errata from RFC 2445 (see page 166). I'm
sure the corrections can be implemented or verified pretty easily. The
burden may fall on the Free Association project as much as if not more
so than on us.
Wondering why it is an entirely new RFC for a bunch (11 to be precise)
of errata. It could easily have been RFC 2445 spec 2 or something
similar.
That's the standard process for updating RFCs. You'll notice that it's
been done the same way for RFC822 - 2822 and for DAV RFC2518 - 4918,
etc.
The last two digits of the original RFC number are maintained for
mnemonic reasons during the process, too.
Cheers,
Andrew.
http://andrew.mcmillan.net.nz/ Porirua, New Zealand
Twitter: _karora Phone: +64(272)DEBIAN
Necessity is the mother of documentation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
