On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> > I am testing Evo with our GroupDAV server and after a moment it
>> responds
>> > with 'address book not available
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts on this? If I file a bug, should it go to
> evolution, or something like gtkhtml or libxml or something else?
>
> I'm not really clear on the breakdown in responsibility for the Gnome
> components in Evo.
When in dou
Anyone have any thoughts on this? If I file a bug, should it go to
evolution, or something like gtkhtml or libxml or something else?
I'm not really clear on the breakdown in responsibility for the Gnome
components in Evo.
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 23:13 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all. Occasiona
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 10:37 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > Sounds like a gnome-icon-theme issue to me. Last week they suddenly
> > and without warning dropped the "mail-mark-notjunk" icon from their
> > "stable" release, as apparently it was
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 10:24 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> But, someone (maybe me!) has made a mistake here. The freedesktop.org
> icon naming specification CLEARLY shows that the name of the icon is
> "mail-mark-notjunk", not "mail-mark-not-junk":
Crikey! Good catch! And I see you already filed a
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 17:04 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Sounds like a gnome-icon-theme issue to me. Last week they suddenly
> and without warning dropped the "mail-mark-notjunk" icon from their
> "stable" release, as apparently it was a redundant and misspelled
> version of the correct icon nam
