Re: [Evolution-hackers] e_cal_remove_object_with_mod() + empty rid: semantic?

2011-05-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello Ross! Can you perhaps comment? You wrote the TODO items below... On Di, 2011-05-03 at 18:04 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: I also wonder about the objects-removed signal in ECalView. If there are two events, one with RRULE and one with RECURRENCE-RULE, and both get removed, should there be

[Evolution-hackers] NO_THISANDFUTURE/THISANDPRIOR and file backend

2011-05-12 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello! Why does the file backend claim that it doesn't support CAL_STATIC_CAPABILITY_NO_THISANDFUTURE and CAL_STATIC_CAPABILITY_NO_THISANDPRIOR? There is code for these in remove_object_instance_cb(), e_cal_backend_file_modify_object() and e_cal_backend_file_remove_object(). Is all of that dead

Re: [Evolution-hackers] NO_THISANDFUTURE/THISANDPRIOR and file backend

2011-05-12 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 13:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello! Why does the file backend claim that it doesn't support CAL_STATIC_CAPABILITY_NO_THISANDFUTURE and CAL_STATIC_CAPABILITY_NO_THISANDPRIOR? There is code for these in remove_object_instance_cb(),