On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 17:57 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag 01 April 2012, um 11:13:00 schrieb Robie Basak:
Hi freeassociation-devel,
I think I've tracked down a segfault in evolution to a bug in libical.
In icaltimezone.c:icaltimezone_get_builtin_timezone,
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 19:10 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
Just rough thinking, nothing elaborate as yet - I'll be meditating
this. :)
Rough thinking here too. I'll let it simmer.
Hi,
this thread is getting quite
Hi Milan,
thanks a lot for joining us and for writing the nice summary!
This is much appreciated. If the mail thread becomes too long
and overly complicated, it may make sense to drop the findings
into a wiki page and work it out from there.
First of all, no, the things discussed here are not
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:32 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
First of all, no, the things discussed here are not going to be
easy, and it raises the question what Evolution actually wants
to be. Does it want to be a fully offline-capable PIM/groupware
client? That means, does it want to
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 13:11 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 19:10 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
How about the service-available to be set much like the to-be
network-available, through GNetworkMonitor, as an EBackend property,
which, when changed, emits a signal?
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:25 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
Nitpicky, but what happens if a backend has to deal with multiple hosts?
The only example I can think of at the moment, and it's a stretch, is
the Google Contacts backend. It connects to one host for authentication,
and a different one
