[Evolution-hackers] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - April 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-04-17 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution's GTK+ requirement

2012-04-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
Given all the scrolling and selection bug reports I'm seeing from GTK-3.4 users, none of which are present when building against GTK-3.2, I suggest we keep our minimum requirement at GTK-3.2 until these issues get sorted out, either by us or by Xorg/GTK+ developers. The problems seem to have

[Evolution-hackers] moving messages is visually slow

2012-04-17 Thread David Roguin
Hi, I've noticed that moving messages takes considerably more time than deleting them. Visually when I delete a message I see the item disappear almost instantly, I'd like to achieve the same thing when I move a message. Is there any way to achieve this? Maybe hiding the selected items and then

Re: [Evolution-hackers] moving messages is visually slow

2012-04-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:10 -0300, David Roguin wrote: I've noticed that moving messages takes considerably more time than deleting them. Visually when I delete a message I see the item disappear almost instantly, I'd like to achieve the same thing when I move a message. Is there any way to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution's GTK+ requirement

2012-04-17 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 09:35 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: Sound okay? Any objections? Sounds fine to me; the only problem I have is that you feel you have to ask in the first place :) Allowing users to build with the old version (of *anything* until there's a *compelling* reason to break the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution's GTK+ requirement

2012-04-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 22:25 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: It's a constant PITA that you have to have the latest versions of *everything*, when in practice most of those dependencies aren't really true at all. That's not true for Evolution. We don't require unstable releases of base libraries,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] moving messages is visually slow

2012-04-17 Thread Zan Lynx
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 11:10 -0300, David Roguin wrote: I've noticed that moving messages takes considerably more time than deleting them. Visually when I delete a message I see the item disappear almost instantly, I'd like to achieve

Re: [Evolution-hackers] moving messages is visually slow

2012-04-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 17:03 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Please make sure that you have a good way to inform the user so that he knows Evolution is busy. He needs to know when it is okay to suspend the laptop or pull the networking cable out. That's what the task bar at the bottom is for.