On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:16 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Hm, that would affect Evolution's *own* performance? It was taking
> about 40ms for each call to imapx_expunge_uid_from_summary(), probably
> in camel_folder_summary_remove_uid(). Most of the time was spent
> waiting on a futex.
It's def
pull down the source and look in the evolution/plugins directory
On 5/19/2012 3:16 AM, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
Greetings
How does one begin to script plugins for Evolution.
I'm considering an exploration into mail-merging. Similar to this one
for Thunderbird
( https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thund
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:16 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> camel-imapx:ERROR:camel-imapx-server.c:1373:imapx_untagged: code should not
> be reached
> Aborted
>
> That's an abort when it receives a FETCH response for a message it
> didn't think it knew about. But it *had*. I'll do a better analys
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Sasa Ostrouska wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>>
>> I don't know, but Evo takes several minutes to start with tracker, vs a few
>> seconds without.
>>
>
> I have still Evo 2.26.x and sometimes tracker is really a pain. It is
> use
I don't know, but Evo takes several minutes to start with tracker, vs a few
seconds without.
David Woodhouse a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> I'm using Debian, and found Evo getting slower and slower (I've got
> something like 44K messages in my inbox).
> No
Some kind of indexing system. Useless for the pain it causes.
Onyeibo Oku a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit :
> > I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4.
> >
> > It seems to have jus
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 07:26 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> Once the index is up to date there is almost no way it noticeably
> effects performance unless something else it wrong.
Heh. To "effect performance"¹ would be to make it go fast, right? :)
--
dwmw2
¹ as opposed to "affect performa
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:49 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit :
> > > I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4.
> > > It seems to have just noticed that I archived a quarter's
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> I'm using Debian, and found Evo getting slower and slower (I've got
> something like 44K messages in my inbox).
> Now I just removed Tracker from my system, and it's snappy again.
> Happy me.
Hm, that would affect Evolution's *own* perform
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit :
> > I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4.
> >
> > It seems to have just noticed that I archived a quarter's mail, and is
> > deleting the old messages from i
Hi,
Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit :
> I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4.
>
> It seems to have just noticed that I archived a quarter's mail, and is
> deleting the old messages from its cache... taking about 40 seconds to
> delete each 1,000 messages. T
Greetings
How does one begin to script plugins for Evolution.
I'm considering an exploration into mail-merging. Similar to this one
for Thunderbird
( https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/mail-merge/ )
How can one begin to navigate towards realising this? Any guides,
libraries, SDK
12 matches
Mail list logo
