Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: The backend-facing APIs less so. They tend to see more churn anyway, even without my branch. I can't think of a recent release where the backend APIs didn't change a little. And that's fine -- the damage is contained -- but we still have to go touch all the backends for every API change and some of those aren't trivial. And especially with this new E-D-S architecture I've cooked up, which is an improvement but still far from perfect, I think we'll be seeing a rash of backend API changes over the next few devel cycles. So I'm not really buying the toy argument. Hi, OK, I suppose we can always reincarnate it when there will be enough user demand on it. The last backend API changes seemed to me as not that complicated, at least those I helped with (on review and backend adaptation parts), kind of monkey work there, but I agree that some changes can be harder to test. What about a compromise, drop support for evolution-exchange when 3.7.x development begins? I suppose it'll be fair to have the main API changes done and any potential community person taking care of it will not need to learn all the hard changes being done during 3.5.x, thus it'll be lighter start for him/her/them. Bye, Milan ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: Fixing some of the brokenness of the To/Cc/Bcc headers in the composer would be wonderful. ... We should also be able to send a mail with the following headers: To: Some people I want to invite to my party : ; Bcc: f...@bar.com ... Hi, both issues are unrelated to Dan's changes, from my point of view, and I suppose both of them are filled as bugs in bugzilla. Dan's effort is to get rid of GtkHTML from evolution, while your issues are partly in ENameSelectorEntry - the first one, the other one in SMTP provider (or somewhere around, in evolution's sending routines). Bye, Milan ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Let's set the date for 3.4.3 release
Hi, it's after 3.5.2 and I guess we can set the date for 3.4.3 release now. It'll be the last planned release in 3.4.x cycle, and the sources contain few fixes for it already (in various core products). The 3.4.2 happened on May 14th, thus I'm proposing June 18th for 3.4.3, just a week before 3.5.3. There are still two weeks for changes, in case of sever bug(s) being found in the stable release. Does it work for others? Bye, Milan ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
