On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 00:37 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > This has been tested with MUNI IMAP server along with: > Subject: [PATCH evolution-data-server] imapx: Treat BODY[HEADER] as > equivalent to RFC822.HEADER > Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:10:57 +0100 > Message-id: <1388347857-1479-1-git-send-email-lkund...@v3.sk> > > camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c > b/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c > index c86165b..c924d39 100644 > --- a/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c > +++ b/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c > @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ camel_imapx_namespace_new (CamelIMAPXNamespaceCategory > category, > CamelIMAPXNamespace *namespace; > > g_return_val_if_fail (prefix != NULL, NULL); > - g_return_val_if_fail (separator != '\0', NULL); > > /* Not bothering with GObject properties for this class. */ >
Thanks for that. I remember not being sure about that assertion when I wrote it. Either the RFC wasn't clear or I missed some fine print. I'll commit this and your BODY[HEADER] patch for the next release. For future reference it's better to submit patches to our bug tracking system [1] so we can... well, track them easier. Matthew Barnes [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
