Re: [Evolution-hackers] Refactoring contact editor

2014-09-04 Thread schaarsc
Am Mittwoch, den 03.09.2014, 18:14 +0200 schrieb Milan Crha: > it sounds like Patrick Ohly's "[Evolution-hackers] custom labels" > discussion [1] from this year's spring. That's much more work than > just replace custom widgets with a stock expander. besides of being more work than just removing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Refactoring EWS GAL sqlitedb

2014-09-04 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: [...] > This works fairly nicely, although there are some optimisations I can > still do. > > Firstly, I'd like a way to 'SELECT uid,bdata from folder_id'. Getting > the initial list of UIDs to build my hash table takes about 95ms. > Gettin

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Refactoring EWS GAL sqlitedb

2014-09-04 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 07:07 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > Hi, > I see. Do you compute the hash on your own, or it is provided by the > OAB? I'm computing it on my own. I'm just using the SHA1 of the binary record in the OAB file, since that's easy enough to calculate. Then stick it in the 'bdat

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Refactoring contact editor

2014-09-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 11:53 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > That could be part of it. The more important aspect (to me at least) is > the increased flexibility (no longer limited to a fixed number of > telephone numbers/emails/etc.) and easier access to information. In most > cases, all data will f

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Refactoring contact editor

2014-09-04 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 18:14 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 12:55 -0300, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > > While we're here, do you think it would be a good idea to > > migrate away from the hard coded list of vcard labels/ids ? > > > > If you're going to redo the UI anyway, it might