Re: [Evolution-hackers] Imminent critical SSL problem in evolution 3.10
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 10:00 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: OK, I reopened it as incomplete. You can't close it as FIXED when it isn't upstream in the gnome tree because that's going to cause massive confusion: a package maintainer reading the bugzilla list is going to think they're getting the fix from the 3.10 branch when, in fact, they're not. If there's some reason not to incorporate the distro patch into the 3.10 fixes branch, then close it as WONTFIX with reference to the distro patch. Hi, we look on the same thing in a different ways. My point of view: the *current* stable version is 3.12.x (right now 3.12.7). This current stable version doesn't suffer of the issue described for 3.10 version. It's not my fault that your distribution uses obsolete evolution version; I do not have any influence on it. The bug as such is fixed, in the *current* stable version. The 3.10 is dead for the upstream. Nonetheless, my intention was to provide a fix for such distributions anyway, in a way I chose. I'm not going to commit the patch to the gnome-3-10 branch, I do not like to add changes into dead branches, where no releases will be done. Bye, Milan ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Imminent critical SSL problem in evolution 3.10
On 10/29/2014 02:56 AM, Milan Crha wrote: we look on the same thing in a different ways. My point of view: the *current* stable version is 3.12.x (right now 3.12.7). This current stable version doesn't suffer of the issue described for 3.10 version. It's not my fault that your distribution uses obsolete evolution version; I do not have any influence on it. The bug as such is fixed, in the *current* stable version. The 3.10 is dead for the upstream. Nonetheless, my intention was to provide a fix for such distributions anyway, in a way I chose. I'm not going to commit the patch to the gnome-3-10 branch, I do not like to add changes into dead branches, where no releases will be done. Rather than burying the patch in Bugzilla or on a dead git branch, I suggest sending it to distributor-l...@gnome.org with an explanation of what versions are affected. Then if any other complaints crop up you can show that distributors still shipping an unsupported Evolution release have been informed. Matthew Barnes ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Imminent critical SSL problem in evolution 3.10
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 07:56 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 10:00 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: OK, I reopened it as incomplete. You can't close it as FIXED when it isn't upstream in the gnome tree because that's going to cause massive confusion: a package maintainer reading the bugzilla list is going to think they're getting the fix from the 3.10 branch when, in fact, they're not. If there's some reason not to incorporate the distro patch into the 3.10 fixes branch, then close it as WONTFIX with reference to the distro patch. Hi, we look on the same thing in a different ways. My point of view: the *current* stable version is 3.12.x (right now 3.12.7). This current stable version doesn't suffer of the issue described for 3.10 version. well, I know this, I run 3.12 as well. That's why the bugzilla is opened against 3.10.x. To close it as fixed becuase it's not a problem in 3.12.x is a brazen lie. It's not my fault that your distribution uses obsolete evolution version; I do not have any influence on it. The bug as such is fixed, in the *current* stable version. The 3.10 is dead for the upstream. Nonetheless, my intention was to provide a fix for such distributions anyway, in a way I chose. I'm not going to commit the patch to the gnome-3-10 branch, I do not like to add changes into dead branches, where no releases will be done. Fine so close it as WONTFIX if you're not maintaining a 3.10.x fixes branch ... it's not rocket science. James ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
