Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Adrián Pérez de Castro
Hello all, Quoting Simon McVittie (2016-10-10 20:57:01) > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:57 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > Can you propose what the necessary change would be to: > > > > > >  

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 10 octobre 2016 à 10:01 +0200, Milan Crha a écrit : > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:39 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > > Also, does CMake support make distcheck yet ? As a downstream > > maintainer, I find many packages with errors in distributed sources > > would have been caught

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:57 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > Can you propose what the necessary change would be to: > > > >  https://people.gnome.org/~walters/build-api/build-api.md > > Well that document is Autotools-specific. It would

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > To get them building again from HEAD again, what you can do is add a > compatibility configure script as described in: I don't want to add compatibility configure scripts to GNOME modules that switch to CMake or Meson. Continuous should just

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:57 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > I agree about whatever we switch GNOME over to en-masse, but for > scattered projects, I'm less sure, and I'm particularly less sure > about > CMake, where there seems to be a certain lack of uniformity. Hm yes, that's one of the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:37 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > To get them building again from HEAD again, what you can do is add > > a > > compatibility configure script as described in: > > I don't want to add compatibility configure

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 09:33 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > I plan to merge the changes the next Monday, October 10th, some time > after the 3.22.1 release. This way there will be enough time to catch > any issues before the 3.23.1 release. Hi, this is a notice that the changes had been

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:39 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Also, does CMake support make distcheck yet ? As a downstream > maintainer, I find many packages with errors in distributed sources > would have been caught by make distcheck when releasing. Hi, CMake doesn't "support" it