Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

able releases before moving externally, but getting the patches upstream would be good. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel in evolution-data-server, a different proposal

ould be that most of these components would be > reusable by application developers that don't have to use the Evolution > data server at all. > > Why glue it? I think you're only real example is camel, which shares code with the other pieces anyhow. -JP -- JP Rosevear <

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Spam attack on go-evolution.org

g/wiki/Captcha) support there to prevent further issues. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers