On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:50 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:16 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:50 +0530, Bharath Acharya wrote:
> >
> > > The nightly builds were broken because of some IMAPX issues. They
> > are up
&
mplains that "Nothing provides
libgtkimageview.so.0 64 bit". Just thought I'd let you know.
Regards,
--
John Lange
http://www.johnlange.ca
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 17:05 +, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:19 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > I'm looking to get Evolution 2.29.6 for testing a bug fix:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603715
> >
> > What w
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 19:14 -0800, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:00 -0500, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:17 -0600, John Lange wrote:
> > > Just curious if anyone is doing nightly (or frequent) package builds for
> > >
hich was a big
headache.
Barring that, what would be the best way to test the current unstable
release of Evolution? Should I just compile it from source and run it
from my home directory? Again, I fear the list of "dev" package
dependencies.
Regards,
--
John Lange
htt
