Re: [Evolution-hackers] Calendar Maintainership

2007-05-31 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:32 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hi friends, It is with immense pleasure I announce that Christian Kellner joins Chenthill as Calendar Maintainer. He is popularly known as gicmo on IRC. Gicmo is already the maintainer of gnome-vfs. He is the author and the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello, did the slightly inflammatory subject catch your attention? Good, please keep reading... ;-) Details can be found in multiple Bugzilla entries, the most important one apparently being this one:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-11 Thread P Chenthill
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 00:42 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used a different TZID after changing the timezone

Re: [Evolution-hackers] time zone problem: extending API instable branch?

2008-06-12 Thread P Chenthill
Hi Srini, The patches are available at comment #4. The two new files e-cal-check-timezones.[ch] which adds new API's. - Chenthill. Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/08 8:44 AM Patrick, Can you just point us to the right patch, that extends API ? I seem to hit the wrong

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Coding style

2009-06-01 Thread P Chenthill
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 16:13 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, Whilst working on the merge of eds-dbus I noticed again that the coding styles in e-d-s are really mixed up. What is the official coding style (mainly indent size and tabs/spaces)? You find the official coding-style at

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Request for upgrading the minimum sqlite version to the latest stable version 3.6.x

2009-06-03 Thread P Chenthill
To be more specific 3.6.x = 3.6.14.2 (latest stable version) would be better unless there is a reason not to have it as a minimum version. Thanks, Chenthill. On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:27 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Hi, We (evolution team) would like to request upgrading the minimum required

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GNOME 3.0 - Evolution plans IRC team meeting

2009-06-24 Thread P Chenthill
I will not be able to attend the irc meeting today. But the following log has the discussion we had on Wednesday night in the channel. My opinions are put in there. It would be good if its taken into account while discussing this in the meeting. - Chenthill. On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:47 +0530,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 07:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:35 +0530, Sankar P wrote: I don't see a high data content. There are Camel docs, plugin docs, some design docs about shell and threading, most of which will have to change anyway, soon. And most of the other

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-30 Thread P Chenthill
We had a discussion in yesterday's #evolution-meet about the go-evolution.org wiki to conclude on things. We have now made a decision to move the wiki to l.g.o. The archived contents would be eventually moved to www.gnome.org/projects/evolution . Time-line for the same is not yet decided.