Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing local junk folder?

2007-11-27 Thread Øystein Gisnås
The default local account in Evolution stores mail in the mbox format located in ~/.evolution/mail/local. Each folder is stored in a separate file named the same as the folder. Metadata, summary and indices are stored in files starting with the folder name and .. The junk folder is not a proper

[Evolution-hackers] GMail IMAP support in Evolution

2007-10-24 Thread Øystein Gisnås
Google seem to be in the process of introducing IMAP support to GMail [1]. Personally I think GMail offers an extremely attractive email solution by now. Evolution does already support integration with GMail via SMTP and POP, and now also via IMAP. In addition to following the IMAP standards as

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago some of the Debian packagers were

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/5/31, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: 2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Improved vCard parser

2007-05-30 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/5/30, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 07:59 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: I posted some lines about improvements to the vCard parser, but it seems like getting multi-megabyte attachments take some time to get through to the mailing list. So I posted to my blog

[Evolution-hackers] Upgrade path from 2.6 to 2.10

2007-04-14 Thread Øystein Gisnås
Are there any changes in the data format between 2.6 and 2.10.1? Or anything else that may cause trouble without installing 2.8 in between? We're considering to package 2.10.1 as a replacement for 2.6.3 in the Debian distributions. If there are any possible upgrade problems, we'd like to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gtkhtml API version

2007-04-14 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/4/14, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 16:51 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: What happened to the gtkhtml API versioning before the GNOME 2.18 release? Seems like it was a mistake to do the bump in http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtkhtml/trunk/configure.in?r1=8408r2

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libebook scalability

2007-04-02 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/4/2, Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large addressbooks. Details at http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html Looks fine to commit

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libebook scalability

2007-04-02 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/4/2, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:03 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: I'd also love to create scripts, code and test data to test performance of some of the most important functions. Then we would be able to track performance over time in a more scientific way

[Evolution-hackers] libebook scalability

2007-04-01 Thread Øystein Gisnås
I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large addressbooks. Details at http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when returned from the backend? Does anyone know? If not, g_list_reverse can be

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Backport of fix to Too Many Open Files problem

2007-01-11 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2007/1/11, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 23:26 +0100, Øystein Gisnås wrote: I see users on 2.6.3 struggle with the problem described at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2006-October/msg00130.html http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34

[Evolution-hackers] Backport of fix to Too Many Open Files problem

2007-01-10 Thread Øystein Gisnås
). Looks like someone attempted a fix and it's been reverted and rewritten again. What's the correct patch for the problem. Does anyone have a gut feeling if it's good to backport that to 2.6.3? Cheers, Øystein Gisnås Debian Evolution Maintainer Team

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution - vcard import problem in 2.8

2006-10-19 Thread Øystein Gisnås
2006/10/19, Patrick Ohly [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On So, 2006-10-15 at 22:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: * Is someone going to take care of the reported regression or do you need a patch to fix it? Whoever changed the code between 2.6 and 2.8 should be in a better position to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] automated testing of Evolution data server with SyncEvolution

2006-10-15 Thread Øystein Gisnås
is in experimental, and we still hope we can push that in before the release of etch. I would recommend developing against 2.8 actually, since your application isn't targeted for etch. /* Øystein Gisnås */ ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers

[Evolution-hackers] libecal and libedata-cal versions

2006-07-31 Thread Øystein Gisnås
During the 2.6.x cycle, there were version bumps of libecal and libedata-cal to make up for a previous ABI break in these two libraries. It was unfortunate to bump the versions in a stable tree, but now I'm more interested in the 2.8.x release. When the version bump was commited to 2.6.x, it was

[Evolution-hackers] addressbook-file plugin

2006-05-07 Thread Øystein Gisnås
a some good reasoning for the current solution, I'll file a bug about it and start testing a patch. Cheers, Øystein Gisnås signature.asc Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Request for adding version information to libcamel soname

2006-04-23 Thread Øystein Gisnås
will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, -- Øystein Gisnås Debian Evolution Maintainer Team signature.asc Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

[Evolution-hackers] Request for adding version information to libcamel soname

2006-04-22 Thread Øystein Gisnås
):$(LIBCAMEL_AGE) for 2.6 and upstream does the same for the next release with bumped versions. How does that sound? -- Øystein Gisnås Debian Evolution Maintainer Team signature.asc Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel ___ Evolution-hackers mailing