Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-data-server without ssl

2010-12-15 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 15:42 +0800, Zhai, Edwin wrote: After this commit, prio.h is included unconditionally so that evolution-data-server depends on nspr and disable-ssl doesn't work any more. It's okay for normal distribution, but we'd like to keep the simplicity in embed world. Is it

[Evolution-hackers] If an account changes, who regenerates the services?

2010-10-19 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
Hi, all, I'm trying to unwind some code in Camel and in Evolution. The problem I have is that if you change an email account's extra options (e.g. imapx's apply filters to new messages), then those changes don't take effect until you restart Evolution. That option is a filter parameter in a

[Evolution-hackers] Tables and spacing for empty rows/columns

2010-04-18 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
I just noticed that GtkTable requests and allocates size for rows and columns that are empty, or that have no visible widgets in them. This leads to surprising spacings in the end. For example, say we have a 3x3 table like this, and the table has a certain row spacing. child11child12

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evolution 2.30.0 (was Re: Patch for Evo 2.30 - size of mail sidebar)

2010-03-30 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 04:10 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Can we get a 2.30.0.1 tarball that uses some non-deprecated API or, even better, that doesn't use -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED by default? Ugh, sorry about the breakage. I'm building Evo on GTK+ for GNOME 2.28; that's why I didn't notice

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving the struct instance heap space to mmap

2006-09-07 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:14 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: The *new*/*extra* idea is to create a second index file which contains the offsets to the pointers in the camel summary file. Then mmap also that file. Extra because the idea will build on top of the existing Ummm, but this won't

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory consumption and virtual machines

2006-07-19 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 17:40 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: ... On the other hand, Philip, next time we meet in person I'll happily buy you dinner :) oh ... what about Boston? :) I'll check with my daytime employer whether it's okay if I can visit the Summit. I don't know for sure

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory consumption and virtual machines

2006-07-18 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:29 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: I'm waiting for the decision (yours) of making this optional using a compilation flag or at run-time. Let's do this in the usual manner: 0. Polish the patch in the usual way: make sure it follows the indentation and naming conventions

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory consumption and virtual machines

2006-07-18 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 14:46 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: I have to wonder if it's even worth ever merging the mmap hack into Evolution at all. If the plan is to finish Zucchi's disk-summary branch, which also solves the memory problems (afaik) as well as: 1. introducing an API for using