On 2018-06-14 at 12:53, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 10:10 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>> ... thus it's probably because nobody noticed.
>
> Hi,
> just a note, Evolution 3.30.0+ will use User-Agent instead of X-Mailer
> header when sending messages:
>
Le 30/05/2018 à 09h00, Milan Crha a écrit :
> On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 01:43 +0200, Garreau, Alexandre wrote:
>> If you inspect the In-Reply-To headers you’ll see none of these is
>> marked as an answer to another, yet References mark them because some
>> of them do ref
On 2018-05-30 at 08:47, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 03:04 +0200, Garreau, Alexandre wrote:
>> I didn’t understand… you receive the message then, right?
>
> Yes, but not from the list.
Hmm… that’s why I don’t like a such configuration, a such proper
handling would r
On 2018-05-29 at 10:06, Milan Crha wrote:
> By the way, this particular question belongs to evolution-list, rather
> than to evolution-hackers. The later is for coders, while you are
> discussing user functions. Not a big deal, just saying.
Should we cross-post to evolution-list, then stop
On 2018-05-29 at 10:06, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 02:48 +0200, Garreau, Alexandre wrote:
>> (not the same thing as a thread may change topic by having one of its
>> participant changing its subject line)
>
> Hi
> off topic:
> a) I'm replying inte
Le 29/05/2018 à 01h35, Ángel a écrit :
> On 2018-05-28 at 23:21 +0200, Garreau, Alexandre wrote:
>> On 2018-05-28 at 15:40, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> > Reply-To-List is the only option anyone should ever use, IMNSHO. Doing
>> > anything else is bad netiquette.
&g
On 2018-05-28 at 15:40, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> “reply in private to the list, outside of the knowledge of eventual
>> participants). The problem here is “reply to the list” is not the
>> canonical standard thing most people will want to do, it is just the
>> complementary opposite of “reply
Hi,
Recently I received a mail from Evolution, and as I recalled it a bit
(it was my first ever free-software mail user-agent! ^^ which I always
recommanded at the time I still used GNOME), I subsequently retried it
to inspect its behavior.
In both occurence I noted the usage of, non-standard as
Hi,
Recently I missed a mail, for only some days fortunately, but knowing
myself I might have missed a lot more this way: this mail was an answer
on a mailing list, to a mail I sent there, and it didn’t include me in
either the “To:” nor the “Cc:” header, thought the user (whose
Hi,
I justed wanted to say that I was astonished by Evolution working out of
the box with all the mails I stored using Gnus Emacs “nnml” backend,
which, as far as I remember, is like “nnmh” (or also “nnspool”, say the
documentation) backend, except it has “.overview” files to index files
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
