[Evolution-hackers] Evolution slowing down

2012-11-27 Thread Karl Relton
Hi all Is it just me, or is evolution 3.6 now really slow. I find opening and closing message windows markedly slower than 3.2 on the same hardware. Even worse, the slowness gets worse with usage - so after a day's usage it is pretty intolerable (to the point where the window manager kicks in

[Evolution-hackers] Please comment on patch for evolution contacts access in deskbar-applet

2007-08-02 Thread Karl Relton
Hi friends The deskbar-applet utility uses e-d-s to search through evo addressbooks. However the code used wasn't working on evo-ldap addressbooks. On investigation, I found the code was using e_book_new_from_uri when it could have simply been using e_book_new. Changing as per the attached patch

[Evolution-hackers] Addressbook connection status

2007-07-13 Thread Karl Relton
Hi friends Shouldn't e_book_backend_open (in e-book-backend.c) report the connection status as well as the writable status? Otherwise we get this problem: 1) App A opens an addressbook, causing it to be opened in e-d-s for the first time, and thus also causing it to be loaded. This typically

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-06-01 Thread Karl Relton
Review from anyone? ... Hi friends I have submitted new patches to bugzilla for bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311512 One changes e-d-s as Fejj suggested, the other does the Evolution side so it will only do mail-notification on 'truely' new messages. I'll be pleased if

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-05-20 Thread Karl Relton
Hi friends I have submitted new patches to bugzilla for bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311512 One changes e-d-s as Fejj suggested, the other does the Evolution side so it will only do mail-notification on 'truely' new messages. I'll be pleased if you could review. Karl On

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-04-26 Thread Karl Relton
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:29 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Yes - I had thought of this too. The trouble is with the current code its not quite so simple AFAIK. The filtering that takes place is actually launched from the folder_changed() function in camel-folder.c. In other words, it is

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-04-25 Thread Karl Relton
, 2007-03-30 at 12:43 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 07:51 +0100, Karl Relton wrote: Last week I posted two patches (one for eds, one for evo) on evo bugzill that I believe fix bug 311512. --- camel-folder.h.110 2007-03-20 16:57:40.0 + +++ camel-folder.h

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-04-09 Thread Karl Relton
thanks Karl On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:43 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 07:51 +0100, Karl Relton wrote: Last week I posted two patches (one for eds, one for evo) on evo bugzill that I believe fix bug 311512. --- camel-folder.h.110 2007-03-20 16:57:40.0 +

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug in main_system_beep?

2007-03-31 Thread Karl Relton
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:34 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Whilst looking at the code for other things, I think I have spotted a bug in main_system_beep() in mail-session.c. You are absolutely right. It is a bug and the patch fixes it right. Just for tracking, file a bug and attach the

[Evolution-hackers] Bug in main_system_beep?

2007-03-29 Thread Karl Relton
Srini Welcome to your new role. I posted this on evolution-patches a couple of weeks back, but don't think anyone has got round to it yet ... Whilst looking at the code for other things, I think I have spotted a bug in main_system_beep() in mail-session.c. Comparing the beep function with

[Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-03-29 Thread Karl Relton
Srini Welcome to your new role (again!). Last week I posted two patches (one for eds, one for evo) on evo bugzill that I believe fix bug 311512. Could you take a look - any comments are welcome! Regards Karl ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list

[Evolution-hackers] Another approach for bug 311512

2007-03-02 Thread Karl Relton
Hi all Having not found a satisfactory solution to bug 311512 (new mail notification) by trying to put the notification code into where mail is received by the camel backends, I've looked into a different approach. I was intrigued by how the mail-notification tool works, since it effectively

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patches to fix bug 311512

2007-02-15 Thread Karl Relton
Hi Jeffrey Over on bugzilla for bug 311512 I've been proposing an approach for fixing the bug of new mail notifications... Jeffrey wrote: Karl: this is how we originally implemented this feature... I don't remember what all the problems were, but it's got at least these problems: - it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mail-Notifier

2007-01-04 Thread Karl Relton
Hi, My first post in the list ;-) I've done a very little app in python and GTK than could be useful as an Evolution add-on or plug-in, it's a mail-notifier using Evo's DBus messages. You can download the source code here http://www.kalpe.com/?section=mail_notifier I hope