Uhm, why has this been cross-posted to the hackers list in the first
place?
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 15:18 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:53 -0700, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
Um, wrong answer. He wanted to know if evolution supports message
priority, not marking as important. Message priority allows the
sender to assign a message priority from low = 5, to critical = 1
to the message in the hopes that it helps the receiver determine what
emails to read first. This uses the non-standard mail header
X-Priority.
Evolution supports X-Priority: 1 (critical), and normal email.
IIRC, an important part of the discussion back those days was, that it
is none of the senders business to re-arrange *my* (being the recipient)
priority queue.
I don't know how it's represented underneath in the SMTP headers, but
It isn't. ;-) SMTP doesn't know about this, this is part of its
payload, the email message. SCNR.
the feature I referred to DOES allow the sender to mark the message as
important (using Insert-Prioritize Message). You don't get to give it
a discrete level from 1 to 5; it's either important or normal.
Indeed. That option sets the header:
X-Priority: 1
But, if the SENDER marks it this way, when the recipient gets it it's
marked with the extra exclamation point icon and the summary line is
in red.
guenther
--
char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED];
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
(c=*++x); c128 (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
