On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:57 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:06 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Imagine spastic users that do nothing but scroll all day long at
extremely rapid speeds .. multiply that with 10.000 such users, and you
still wouldn't have any problems
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 21:30 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
We can save some euros by fixing this flaw. We can make it possible to
give poor children a very good E-mail client that uses camel.
Is it still not worth fixing?
I strongly disagree.
Yes it is worth fixing, sorry for not
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 09:34 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
hmm :-) Im taking on these things. Ive got Johnny working on UI with
me. We should be doing a lot of fixes. We probably, can fix as much
as issues as we can. Probably, in the wiki, we can list some of must
fixes and we can go based
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 09:48 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 14:49 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 09:34 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
hmm :-) Im taking on these things. Ive got Johnny working on UI with
me. We should be doing a lot of fixes. We
This bug is really driving me nuts:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255303
The Changelog (grep for bug 55303 not 255303) implies that it's fixed or
at least worked around. But I can definitely confirm that it's not -
switching folders always causes the scroll position to be reset to
