[Evolution-hackers] any point in server side indices?

2009-09-08 Thread Ross Boylan
Cyrus has a facility to maintain indices on the server. Will such indices help evolution? I know it tends to build its own indices, and so suspect the server side indices are irrelevant (I think it takes an IMAP SEARCH command to access them). I'm on evo 2.22 on Debian Lenny. Thanks. Ross

[Evolution-hackers] More on message state

2007-11-30 Thread Ross Boylan
After poking around, I discovered that although follow up status is not preserved on copy, and is not kept on the IMAP server even where it exists, the colored labels are preserved on copy and are kept on the IMAP server (as $Label1, etc). So I think I have a solution to my immediate problem: 1)

[Evolution-hackers] Is there a reason copy does't preserve mark for followup?

2007-11-29 Thread Ross Boylan
state on the IMAP server; some folks gave me some pointers earlier. Thanks. -- Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146 185 Berry St #5700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics fax: (415) 514-8150 University

[Evolution-hackers] Difficulty of storing flags on IMAP server

2007-10-11 Thread Ross Boylan
I believe that some of the flags associated with messages (e.g., follow-up) are stored by the evolution client, rather than kept on the server. For at least some IMAP servers it should be possible to define custom flags on the server and use them. This would be very useful to me, since I'm

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Difficulty of storing flags on IMAP server

2007-10-11 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:29 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 09:18 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: I believe that some of the flags associated with messages (e.g., follow-up) are stored by the evolution client, rather than kept on the server. For at least some IMAP servers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-11 Thread Ross Boylan
I'm preserving the exchange for context; my responses are sprinkled below. On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 23:47 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 15:55 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Second question: even if it creates

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-11 Thread Ross Boylan
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:46 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Speaking of complexity, evolution/camel (and maybe Gnome?) do a kind of objects with C. Why not just use C++? Was the C++ toolchain too unreliable at the start, or was there some other reason? I didn't mean to exclude other alternatives

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-11 Thread Ross Boylan
API. -- Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146 185 Berry St #5700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics fax: (415) 514-8150 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94107-1739

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-10 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: [Ross wrote] Second question: even if it creates a folder, does it need to stick around for the folder creation to finish? I think I remember seeing that camel was single-threaded not true... , relying on the client app to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-08 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: it's not possible to do better w/o dropping features like message threading. In fact, the above minimalizing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-08 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:27 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: . All good points. I should explain I'm thinking of a mode

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-08 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: Why does it need to create a CamelFolder for the destination at all, assuming I keep the focus on the source folder? because you need both a source and a destination folder to move the message(s) to? kinda hard to move messages

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-01 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thursday 31 May 2007 16:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: [snip] Single namespace. It's all INBOX.folder.subfolder. The one wrinkle is that in some cases 'folder' exists in the namespace, but is not an actual box or folder

[Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
to handle the mail store I described? How do I find out which of the imap store's code I'm actually using? Thanks. Ross Boylan ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have an IMAP

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: [Ross] What version to start with? I would prefer, if you can try it with Evolution 2.10.2. It is the most recent stable release. Is EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_1_10_2 the corresponding tag to use for evolution-data-server? -- Ross

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: 2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did