Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - June 20 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-06-20 Thread Chenthill
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 15:26 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:03 +0530, Chenthill wrote: As some of you already know, I moved to some other project and spending most of my time there. At-least during the initial period, I would not be getting much time for evolution

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - June 20 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-06-19 Thread Chenthill
not be getting much time for evolution. Matthew would be taking forward the community meetings hence forth. Thanks, Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Chenthill
Akhil has mentioned in another email. We would also need to give it sometime to see if there are people interested in contributing there. Thanks, Chenthill. If we have consensus on this I will announce it. At this time I have no plans to adapt the module to the upcoming API changes. Matthew

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Retiring evolution-exchange

2012-06-01 Thread Chenthill
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 06:57 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Then why not retire evolution-mapi instead of evolution-exchange ? I hadn't considered that. I'll defer to Milan to make that call. I thought evolution-mapi worked with Exchange

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - April 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-04-17 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory corruption in timezone handling

2012-04-04 Thread Chenthill
fork of libical or whether they're using upstream libical. From what the sources and configure.ac tell me, it is the latter. I guess we should communicate this to freeassociation-devel? We moved to upstream libical long time back - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541209 . - Chenthill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit branch is ready

2012-03-30 Thread Chenthill
in 3.6 after all :) Wonderful!!! - Chenthill. Dan -Srini. I'd suggest creating 4 or 5 new commits directly in master instead of actual git merge to avoid polluting master history with nearly 200 commits of my furious development :) Cheers, Dan

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Mar 21 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-03-20 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] e_cal/book_open() + only_if_exists

2012-02-14 Thread Chenthill
UI in-responsiveness. IMHO that option can be removed and the async api's can be used to solve it unless there is some other case. - Chenthill. Bye, Milan ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Feb 15 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-02-14 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Home news from the Evo/WebKit Universe

2012-02-14 Thread Chenthill
early on in the branch. Nearly drove myself crazy trying to get a simple embedded icon to draw. Well done to both of you! +1 :) - Chenthill. Matt ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Jan 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2012-01-17 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UID in vCard

2011-11-16 Thread Chenthill
it into account. Just went through the thread and had a small discussion with mcrha. My preference goes with the first approach along with having the static capability. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Nov 16 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-11-15 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Can I remove some old migration cruft, pretty please?

2011-11-07 Thread Chenthill
is with local providers, users will loose their labels and other custom tags/flags on messages. I do not take it as an objection, though, the migration process used to crash or freeze anyway. You've a green from me. Sounds fine for me as well. - Chenthill. Bye, Milan

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Since evolution-alarm-notify asks for passwords

2011-10-19 Thread Chenthill
not be needed in the evolution-alarm-notify, because evolution doesn't support alarms on these. I dont think the earlier behaviour used to be like this. This should be a bug introduced at some state IMHO. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Oct 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-10-18 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Oct 19 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-10-18 Thread Chenthill
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:30 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote: Hi Chen, Am Dienstag 18 Oktober 2011, um 12:13:04 schrieb Chenthill: Hi, The meeting goes as follows, [...] You sure the meeting is *today*, not tomorrow (i.e. Wednesday), as usual? Just asking. :-) Oh my bad, not again

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Sep 21 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-09-19 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - July 20 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-07-20 Thread Chenthill
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:17 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates Postponing the meeting to next week Wednesday (July 27) as some hackers wont be available today.. Thanks, Chenthill

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - July 20 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-07-18 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [evolution-kolab] towards Upstream-Integration

2011-07-07 Thread Chenthill
eg: evolution-kolab and create a new repository in git.gnome.org. http://live.gnome.org/Git/NewRepository has all the details required. Thanks, Chenthill. Thanks a lot in advance, Kind regards, Christian ___ evolution-hackers mailing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] improve PHOTO support in libebook/EDS

2011-07-07 Thread Chenthill
the staging directory approach. Would it be possible for implementing the logic to convert the inline data -file inside e_book_client_add_contact so that the clients need to worry about changing the code ? - Chenthill. o What is more reliable ? (it seems that there are less points of failure

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] evolution-ews: implement Exchange categories as evolution labels (read only)

2011-05-24 Thread Chenthill
on Thursday. I've reverted those commits for now. We're currently between Alpha and Beta releases; I don't mind a little bit of 'churn', but I draw the line at data loss :) Sorry about that. Sorry for it, its a bad assumption I made. Fixed it in master. - Chenthill. Note that HEAD doesn't compile

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Indexing of mail body? how it works?

2011-05-20 Thread Chenthill
or maildir or do you have them on some server, cached them using imap or pop ? - Chenthill. Many many thanks! Nicolas. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 32 bit IDs in contact file backend

2011-05-18 Thread Chenthill
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:59 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Di, 2011-05-17 at 18:49 +0530, Chenthill wrote: On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:51 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: | Further work if you agree in principle: | * let clients query whether all contacts have the simplified ID

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 32 bit IDs in contact file backend

2011-05-17 Thread Chenthill
need this virtual function though. Maybe webdav might use it ? - Chenthill. But *only* if it really is an optimisation, and designed such that the code still works (via the mapping) without it. I can't promise that the code will work without it right away because the mapping hasn't been

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - May 18 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-05-16 Thread Chenthill
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates Check out http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet for more details. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-09 Thread Chenthill
this. As an extra bonus that means you could do autocomplete type queries in a single SQL query. AFAIK with the current design of eds, each address-book would be queried separately and would not benefit by this. - Chenthill. sean ___ evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-09 Thread Chenthill
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 08:56 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: (Please do not reply to me, reply to the list, I read the list and I prefer to Ctrl+L while your message avoids this feature for me. Thanks for your understanding.) On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 12:23 +0530, Chenthill wrote: you scary me. Could

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-05 Thread Chenthill
to be on this, but if you're looking to offload any work, I can pick up anything that results from the above if you like. Just let me know! The work is almost over, but will let you know once i finish the testing and you can directly make changes if you require anything more there :) - Chenthill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-05 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 11:20 +0530, Chenthill wrote: * not sure of this one: given there may be multithreaded access to the db, do we need to provide any external big locks on reads/writes? maybe Though sqlite has it, i have read in the FAQ that it recommends applications

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EBookBackendSqliteDB comments

2011-05-05 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 13:53 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 11:20 +0530, Chenthill wrote: * if folder metadata is going to be free-form, it could be better to have a key-value table ( folder_id_id int, key_name text, value text ) rather than arbitrarily numbered

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-04-26 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 08:32 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 17:00 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 19:39 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: I would like you to a incorporate some change to the free/busy api. Some servers allow querying free/busy information

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - April 20 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-04-19 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates Check out http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet for more details. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New 'eclient' branch in eds

2011-04-19 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
: freebusy_received (ECalClientFreeBusy *fbobject, const gchar *user, GSList *ecalcomps) The clients could watch for the signal and update the freebusy information as and when they receive from eds. - Chenthill. EBookClient (replaces EBook) http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EWS MessageInfo leak wtf

2011-04-11 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
be removed. - Chenthill. -- dwmw2 ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS improvements for MeeGo

2011-04-05 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: On Di, 2011-04-05 at 13:06 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Patrick Ohly patrick.o...@gmx.de wrote: Hello! I have published some more information about our plans for MeeGo: http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Maintenance fork for Evolution / EDS 2.32

2011-04-05 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
to the freezes in the gnome-2-32 branch (am not calling this a latest stable branch) ? If the documentation and translations are taken care of, should the freezes matter ? - Chenthill. That's my opinion.        Bye,        Milan P.S.: as of today (or tomorrow, if you wish), the official stable release

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Mar 23 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-03-22 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates Check out http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet for more details. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sqlite cache for address-book storage in EDS

2011-03-14 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Adam Tauno Williams awill...@opengroupware.us wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:09 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com wrote: Okay, this might be a long shot but I'm gonna throw it out there anyway

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Branch date?

2011-03-14 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
sooner? Am fine with branching on Monday after the hard-code freeze.. - Chenthill. (Speaking for myself, I don't really have anything ready to land yet.) ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sqlite cache for address-book storage in EDS

2011-03-13 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
for using it with mail. To be honest, I wont be having that much time for testing this for address-book. Jony was trying to evaluate the performance between sqlite and notmuch mail indexing for mails, any updates there Jony ? - Chenthill. The catch is, Xapian is written in C++.  So we'd likely have

[Evolution-hackers] Sqlite cache for address-book storage in EDS

2011-03-09 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
sqlite for string emails and later migrating all backends to use the same. The summary and VCard strings can be stored in a single Cache without the need for using EBookBackendSummary. Any thoughts ? - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution

[Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Feb 16 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-02-14 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
Hi, The meeting goes as follows, * Project updates * Discussion on queries/decisions * Individual updates - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Reminder] Evolution community meeting at #evolution-meet channel - Feb 16 - 3:30 PM UTC

2011-02-14 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
the log I'll get it posted. Sure, will send you. - Chenthill. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] (no subject)

2011-02-09 Thread Chenthill Palanisamy
a particular mailing-list is meant for before proceeding with your queries. - Chenthill. Thank you sir!... ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution documentation

2010-02-01 Thread Chenthill
more.. Have pushed in some fixes. Let me know if they fix the issues. Please send me the gdb traces or feel free to file a bug in bugzilla.gnome.org. Thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

2009-12-15 Thread Chenthill
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:09 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:16 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Approach #1, migrating local storage from mbox to maildir format. With maildir I have heard about two issues, * Not able to create subfolders under INBOX - https

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel Manifesto

2009-11-22 Thread Chenthill
not to say, am not longer working on evo. Sharing opinions/ideas is a big contribution in it-self :) It helps people who contribute through code to do the right things. just a humble thought. - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution

[Evolution-hackers] Agenda for the community meeting - Thursday (3:30 PM UTC - 4:30 PM UTC)

2009-11-16 Thread Chenthill
. - Chenthill. chen Lets get started in another minute and have a small discussion to know whats happening and moving further with coming releases mcrha releases, hmm chen mcrha, yup we have 2.28.1 and 29.1 coming this month * mcrha was hoping in the upcoming year forecast :) abharath ;) chen lol step

[Evolution-hackers] evolution 2.28.0 released!!

2009-09-21 Thread Chenthill
involved in Evolution development! This is a special release for myself and mbarnes as we have taken the responsibility of maintainer-ship from this release. Thanks to all the users, testers, developers, translators, bug masters, distributors and everyone involved in the project. Thanks, Chenthill

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28

2009-08-11 Thread Chenthill
will also be discussing over some pending tasks from Evolution 2.28 and include the ones which are possible for http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 . Thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org

[Evolution-hackers] Branching for Evolution 2.28 on Aug 11

2009-08-04 Thread Chenthill
to both 2.28 branch and master. Thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-30 Thread P Chenthill
. Until then the contents would remain in go-evolution.org. Meeting logs - http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/meeting-logs/2009-07-29.shtml . Thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 17:51 +, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 22:57 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: http://www.go

Re: [Evolution-hackers] concurrent modifications of items in GUI and EDS database

2009-07-28 Thread Chenthill
-addressbook dbus port this week (for 2.27.x) and the calendar part for evolution 3.0. Will keep you informed on the same. - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Chenthill
Am including nirav in the thread. He is working on with the novell IST to get the required rights. He would be able to provide more details.. Thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 11:06 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2009, 21:31 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: I don't

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread P Chenthill
still hold true ;) ...snip... If all these does not convince you, you can save dollars on the storage space for the site ;-) . So imho, it is definitely worth moving to live.gnome.org . +1 Well stated. :) I concur with this provided all the old data are still maintained. - Chenthill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-23 Thread Chenthill
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold true ;) A compromise might

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Request for upgrading the minimum sqlite version to the latest stable version 3.6.x

2009-07-21 Thread Chenthill
configure.ac and configure script to add some options. The patch for configure script needs to be regenerated for sqlite 3.6.16. Thanks, Chenthill. On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 04:43 -0600, Chenthill(P Chenthill) wrote: To be more specific 3.6.x = 3.6.14.2 (latest stable version) would be better unless

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GNOME 3.0 - Evolution plans IRC team meeting

2009-06-24 Thread P Chenthill
I will not be able to attend the irc meeting today. But the following log has the discussion we had on Wednesday night in the channel. My opinions are put in there. It would be good if its taken into account while discussing this in the meeting. - Chenthill. On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:47 +0530

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution thoughts for GNOME 3.0

2009-06-20 Thread Chenthill
would have 8 months. - Chenthill. I expect lot of rewrites, dbus port merge, bonobo deprecation (kill bonobo merge). etc. I don't think, Evolution 2.28 can be stable, unless I postpone these tasks which might merge late in 2.28 cycle to really 2.29.x. [...] Thoughts on this? After

[Evolution-hackers] Request for upgrading the minimum sqlite version to the latest stable version 3.6.x

2009-06-03 Thread Chenthill
3.6 Am adding ddl in CC to see if any other application has any issues with the same. Thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Request for upgrading the minimum sqlite version to the latest stable version 3.6.x

2009-06-03 Thread P Chenthill
To be more specific 3.6.x = 3.6.14.2 (latest stable version) would be better unless there is a reason not to have it as a minimum version. Thanks, Chenthill. On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:27 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Hi, We (evolution team) would like to request upgrading the minimum required

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Coding style

2009-06-01 Thread P Chenthill
://projects.gnome.org/evolution/patch.shtml I should admit that we have not followed strictly. - Chenthill. Ross ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libgdata

2009-02-22 Thread Chenthill
, say 'gdata-c' in order provide entire set of Google services. You can probably create a new project in svn.gnome.org for the same. - Chenthill. Regards, Philip Withnall [1]: http://github.com/pwithnall/libgdata/tree/master [2]: http://github.com/pwithnall/libgdata/tree/calendar

Re: [Evolution-hackers] concurrent modifications of items in GUI and EDS database

2009-01-08 Thread Chenthill
? With respect to the e_cal_remove* API, it would be good to have last modified time specified in it. It would then require a new API to be added.. thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-10-06 Thread Chenthill
will make the changes and get the work done for 2.25.1 if the time is sufficient to get libical as a external dependency for GNOME 2.25.1. We would test the library and let you know before oct 17th. thanks, Chenthill. On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:41 +0530, Chenthill wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 22:52

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-19 Thread Chenthill
to use the new calling syntax. Is there anything we can do to facilitate this, or should we just hang out and wait for you folks to kick the tires on the new library? Let me know... I will make the changes and test it over this weekend. thanks, Chenthill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-10 Thread Chenthill
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 18:00 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:12 -0400, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: Chenthill wrote: So it is better to inform all the stake holders about the change and let them depend on the library versions to decide whether to free the memory

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-09 Thread Chenthill
and evolution-data-server. I would not really like to change them again with new APIS :) thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-08 Thread Chenthill
this done for 2.26. thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

2008-09-08 Thread Chenthill
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 12:16 -0400, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: Chenthill wrote: On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 11:02 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello! http://sourceforge.net/projects/freeassociation/ has released 0.32 of libical on 2008-09-01. The KDE-PIM team has switched to that code

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-09-02 Thread Chenthill
Patrick, On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 19:55 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 12:37 +0530, Chenthill wrote: Thanks, I will send out a mail to the list mentioning the critical fixes which have gone in recently in the stable branch which needs to be taken into the distro's

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel-db-summary changes merged to Trunk

2008-07-16 Thread Chenthill
This is great!! I am updating the code now and will test it out :-) - Chenthill. On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:03 +0530, Sankar wrote: Hi , As many of you know, Srini and I were working on a branch camel-db-summary (codenamed Madagascar). This is now merged with trunk. Please see http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] time zone problem: extending API instable branch?

2008-06-12 Thread P Chenthill
Hi Srini, The patches are available at comment #4. The two new files e-cal-check-timezones.[ch] which adds new API's. - Chenthill. Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/08 8:44 AM Patrick, Can you just point us to the right patch, that extends API ? I seem to hit the wrong patch

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-16 Thread chenthill palanisamy
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 18:07 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 13:59 +0530, chenthill wrote: To preserve the timezone history, the best way would be to store the old rules in VTIMEZONES which should be done in libical. If I understand you correctly, you are suggesting

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-15 Thread chenthill
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 23:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 00:55 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: [Exchange calendar backend patch] In cases of exchange the old VTIMEZONE and the new VTIMEZONE would have the same tzid, only the rules would be different. All events old and new

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-11 Thread P Chenthill
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 00:42 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: On Mo, 2008-04-07 at 23:40 -0600, P Chenthill wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 19:45 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: One could argue that the sending program is at fault: it could have used a different TZID after changing the timezone

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread P Chenthill
the patch in for the stable branch also. - Chenthill. Index: calendar/e-cal-backend-exchange.c === --- calendar/e-cal-backend-exchange.c (revision 1330) +++ calendar/e-cal-backend-exchange.c (working copy) @@ -1094,6 +1094,27

Re: [Evolution-hackers] cleaning up the timezone handling mess

2008-04-07 Thread P Chenthill
the patch in for the stable branch also. - Chenthill. Index: calendar/e-cal-backend-exchange.c === --- calendar/e-cal-backend-exchange.c (revision 1330) +++ calendar/e-cal-backend-exchange.c (working copy) @@ -1094,6 +1094,27

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Ical (WebDAV) Web-Calendar read-only!?

2007-11-30 Thread chenthill
guide them. If someone takes it up, prolly we can have in the evolution-2.22 release (next major release) itself. -Chenthill. Would be glad about some answers. Cheers, Artur ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Call for Release Notes

2007-08-30 Thread Chenthill
changes. - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] comma-separation of event CATEGORIES

2007-07-10 Thread Chenthill
Hi Patrick, On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 18:28 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello, I got a report that SyncEvolution does not handle CATEGORIES correctly in ical 2.0 events when multiple categories are specified. It turned out that Evolution or more likely, libical, import/export such events with

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Calendar Maintainership

2007-05-31 Thread P Chenthill
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:32 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Hi friends, It is with immense pleasure I announce that Christian Kellner joins Chenthill as Calendar Maintainer. He is popularly known as gicmo on IRC. Gicmo is already the maintainer of gnome-vfs. He is the author

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Question about Groupwise and Memos (see bug 389668)

2007-02-21 Thread chenthill
changes can be probably taken up for evolution-2.12. thanks, Chenthill. On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 09:39 -0800, Nathan Owens wrote: Back when the Groupwise functionality was implement for the Memos component, the summary and start date fields were added to the Memos GUI. I was wondering why

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Recurrence ID?

2006-10-17 Thread chenthill
Hi Jules, The format of the recurrence id (datetime value) is the same as that is specified in rfc 2445. thanks, Chenthill. On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:49 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: Hi, What is the format of the recurrence ID (const char *rid) as used in get_object(), remove_object

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Converting vevent components into one vcalendar component

2006-08-09 Thread chenthill
Hi teresa, You can probably create a toplevel VCALENDAR component using e_cal_util_new_top_level () and add the VEVENT components to it using icalcomponent_add_component. Hope this answers your question. - Chenthill. On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 15:44 -0400, Teresa Thomas wrote: I intend

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Obtaining all events from Evo Cal

2006-08-08 Thread chenthill
Hi Teresa, Send the query as #t. - Chenthill. On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 18:14 -0400, Teresa Thomas wrote: Hi How can I obtain all the events existing in an ECal. I tried using the function: gbooleane_cal_get_object_list ( ECal *ecal

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ECalBackend vs. ECalBackendSync

2006-07-31 Thread chenthill
? It depends on how client is designed. - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ECalBackend vs. ECalBackendSync

2006-07-31 Thread chenthill
Are you writing a new backend similar to file/http/groupwise ? If so you can implement the virtual methods extending from ECalBackendSync class. You can prolly refer to any of the existing backends or evolution-exchange/calendar. thanks, Chenthill. On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 04:22 -0400, Peter Colijn

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ESourceGroup from ESource

2006-07-20 Thread chenthill palanisamy
, ESourceList object should be alive while accessing the ESource, otherwise ESourceGroup would be NULL if the corresponding ESourceGroup was not ref'ed. - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libecal functions

2006-07-20 Thread chenthill palanisamy
be pointing to contacts backend. - Chenthill. Thanks! On 7/19/06, Teresa Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Mr Palanisamy! My Bad, I actually meant to ask about the function e_cal_component_new() in ECalComponent.h/c. Anyway, from what I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libecal functions

2006-07-19 Thread chenthill palanisamy
/EDS_Architecture . - Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Exposing Evo calendar events

2006-07-19 Thread chenthill palanisamy
/calendar/gui/alarm-notify/ cheers, chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ECalComponentAttendee and ECalComponentOrganizer - an invitation to memory leaks?

2006-06-16 Thread Chenthill
should manage the memory for that member? Groupwise backend does it wrongly which needs to be fixed. Thanks for pointing it out. thanks, Chenthill. ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] What 'role' should a resource-type cutype have?

2006-06-16 Thread Chenthill
; // what else? Is that the best thing to do? - Thoughts? yes, AFAIK the resource would be a non-participant. thanks, Chenthill. Thanks, jules ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: [Evolution-hackers] When do open_sync() gets called from a calendar backend?

2006-05-06 Thread Chenthill
Hi Jules, Once the mode and timezone is set, e_cal_open_async would be called to open the calendar. Please check if e_cal_open_async is being called from evolution. You need not invoke it separately. thanks, Chenthill. On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 14:05 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: Hi, I am