Re: [Evolution-hackers] improved rfc2047 decode patch

2007-12-26 Thread jacky
It seem that your patch don't support this kind of encoded string: =?gb2312?b?any-encoded-text?==?gb2312?b?any-encoded-text?= Two encoded-words are not separated by any character. --- Jeffrey Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: This patch is a port of my GMime rfc2047 decoder which is even more

Re: [Evolution-hackers] improved rfc2047 decode patch

2007-12-26 Thread jacky
--- Jeffrey Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 00:20 +0800, jacky wrote: It seem that your patch don't support this kind of encoded string: =?gb2312?b?any-encoded-text?==?gb2312?b?any-encoded-text?= Two encoded-words are not separated by any character. Are you

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [patch] fixed incorrect rfc2047 decode for CJKheader

2007-12-24 Thread jacky
--- Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: В Пнд, 24/12/2007 в 13:21 +0800, jacky пишет: --- Jeff Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: There are two kind of email need to support: 1) An encoded-word was divided into two line. This was sent by dotProject v2.0.1 . And there are even more

[Evolution-hackers] [patch] fixed incorrect rfc2047 decode for CJK header

2007-12-23 Thread jacky
Hi, all. The rfc2047 decoder in libcamel can not decode some CJK header correctly. Although some of them are not correspond to RFC, but I need to decode it correctly and I thought if evolution can display there email correctly more people like it. So I write a new rfc2047 decoder, and it's in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [patch] fixed incorrect rfc2047 decode for CJK header

2007-12-23 Thread jacky
--- Philip Van Hoof [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hey Jacky, This is a port of your patch to Tinymail's camel-lite Thank you. On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 23:09 +0800, jacky wrote: Hi, all. The rfc2047 decoder in libcamel can not decode some CJK header correctly. Although some of them