Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH][RFC] Deal with negative intervals

2011-02-22 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:22 +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote: [...] My only quibble is that any program should report on a client that creates bogus data, so I should like to see some kind of warning message written in the logs at this point. Good point. The patch I've just pushed uses

[Evolution-hackers] [PATCH][RFC] Deal with negative intervals

2011-02-21 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
Hi, Dealing with the error I posted about on another thread, I found that Google is giving me some recurring events with an interval of -1, which causes evo to search for all years from 2011 to -1, when it errors out because it's no longer a valid time_t (which I guess also explains why it