The Exchange patch looks fine to me.
-Srini.
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:28 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:42 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:25 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi there evos,
For an EPlugin that I'm working on I will
Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hey Philip,
[Im lagging in my mail-replies, still a lot to go, due to my 3 week
vacation.]
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:25 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi there evos,
For an EPlugin that I'm working on I will need a Camel API to get the
filename of the cache.
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:25 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
migrating away from the IMAP specific data cache would be good.
Yes. I think IMAP and the local providers are the only ones that are
still using a specialized datacache.
The IMAP4 one, for example,
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 09:41 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:25 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Maildir doesn't store individual MIME parts separately. So Mailbox is
equally hard to handle for metadata engines as MBox is. Only difference
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:25 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
migrating away from the IMAP specific data cache would be good.
Yes. I think IMAP and the local providers are the only ones that are
still using a specialized datacache.
The IMAP4 one, for example, ain't using a specialized one.
b)
Hey Philip,
[Im lagging in my mail-replies, still a lot to go, due to my 3 week
vacation.]
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 13:25 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi there evos,
For an EPlugin that I'm working on I will need a Camel API to get the
filename of the cache.
Sure and the patch seems fine to
Hi there evos,
For an EPlugin that I'm working on I will need a Camel API to get the
filename of the cache.
I will attach a patch that adds this API. The EPlugin that I'm developing is
available at Bug# 565091 and more information about it can be found at
